Behind the Homefront
A daily chronicle of news in homeland security and military operations affecting newsgathering, access to information and the public's right to know.
Search the archives:
Send comments,
leads, tips or other
information
RSS/XML feed
Return to the Reporters Committee homepage.

On Jan. 24, 2003, a new law enforcement and investigatory agency whose duties include functions taken from as many as 22 other federal agencies came into existence. The reorganization of these operations reportedly marks the biggest government bureaucratic shake-up since the creation of the Department of Defense half a century ago.
Even before the new Department of Homeland Security opened its doors, controversies arose over not just how it would operate and exercise its powers, but what level of access to information it would allow, and how it would respond to news media requests. Will new exemptions be carved out of the FOI Act, either by law or by practice? Will officials and agents feel free to tap phones of journalists, or subpoena their records during investigations? Will the new director consider procedural safeguards, like those adopted years ago by the Department of Justice, to ensure that freedom of the press will not be denied? And will those practices be followed?

But "homeland" security is not the only concern for journalists covering anti-terrorism initiatives; military actions abroad often present a greater challenge, as questions over disclosure of information, access to troops, and restraints on reporting seem to resurface anew with each conflict.

Questions and issues like these led the Reporters Committee to launch this "weblog," so that there will be a centralized site on the Internet for journalists who want to follow these issues and pass along information they learn while covering — or worse, being covered by — the new department and other anti-terrorism actions. Please submit comments and pass along tips to make this project as useful, thorough and up-to-date as possible.

A few words about what this project will not do. We do not intend to cover many of the issues that will undoubtedly come up as the Department takes shape, even if those issues are the ones generating headlines. We will cover information access and free press issues, but will not follow debates over many civil liberties issues that, while important, are outside of our domain.

Funding for the launch of this site was provided by The Robert R. McCormick Tribune Foundation.

All links will open in separate windows; close the window to return to this one.
Please send us tips, information & comments.

Below is the single entry you requested. [Go to main page]

Mar. 26, 2003
CHANGES IN CLASSIFICATION RULES. President Bush cut a key provision in the executive order on classification last night, eliminating language that had required government classifiers to refrain from classification whenever there was "significant doubt" that disclosure might harm national security. An official who played a key role in drafting the amendment called it a "change in tone." The measure automatically classifies foreign government information where disclosure is not authorized. It gives the CIA director broad, but not necessarily final, veto power over an appeal panel's decisions to declassify that agency's documents. And it allows reclassification of documents under some circumstances. The bulk of the 1995 executive order on classification issued by President Clinton remains intact, however.
— Posted at 5:14 pm  [link]
For more entries, use the search option above, or view a previous month:
  2003: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
    2004: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
    2005: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
    2006: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
    2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug