Everything online journalists need to protect their legal rights. This free resource culls from all Reporters Committee resources and includes exclusive content on digital media law issues.
A "strategic lawsuit against public participation," or a suit meant to harass someone involved in a public controversy. As a result, many states have adopted anti-SLAPP statutes that help journalists and others get such cases dismissed early.
© Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100, Arlington, VA 22209, (800) 336-4243 or (703) 807-2100, info@rcfp.org

Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Executive Director Lucy Dalglish testified before the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee of the Maryland General Assembly, in support of SB 221. which clarifies and modernizes Maryland's anti-SLAPP law. SB 221 offers several important improvements to the current law, including the removal of the requirement that defendants show that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in “bad faith” – that is, with the intent to use it to stifle constitutionally protected expression – in order to have the lawsuit dismissed as a SLAPP. By requiring the defendant to prove bad faith, the current law effectively adds a factual element that must be shown through costly discovery. Maryland is the only state in the country with such a requirement.