Everything online journalists need to protect their legal rights. This free resource culls from all Reporters Committee resources and includes exclusive content on digital media law issues.
Urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a controversial whistleblower case in which the public and press were barred from an appellate hearing with no explanation.
The Reporters Committee and other groups urged the new Chief Justice to consider changes to increase the openness of the courts, including allowing proceedings to be televised.
The Reporters Committee filed a motion asking for leave to file a brief in an espionage-related criminal case, which would argue that a broad reading of the statute in the case would allow officials to prosecute journalists for receiving or reporting information the government wants to keep secret.
The Reporters Committee urged the department to adopt a policy similar to the Justice Department's guidelines regarding questioning and subpoenaing members of the news media.
The Reporters Committee argued that the First Amendment rights of journalists are not automatically trumped by California's trade secrets laws when journalists report on a company's marketing plans.
The Reporters Committee argued that the public has a compelling interest in seeing public employees' disciplinary records, especially when they are entrusted with duties that are critical to a community's well-being, such as teaching, law enforcement and emergency response.
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press urged the Supreme Court of Arizona to dismiss an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit over a letter-to-the-editor.