Shield law

Shield laws -- adopted in thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia -- provide varying degrees of protection for reporters from subpoenas. They may provide absolute or qualified protection according to the type of legal proceeding involved (civil or criminal) or the role of the journalist in the proceeding (defendant or independent third party).

Congressional committee holds hearing on national security leak prevention and punishment

Emily Miller | Content Regulation | News | July 11, 2012
News
July 11, 2012

Recent leaks of classified information prompted concerned members of the Congressional House Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing today to address consequences for those involved in releasing and publishing national secrets.

Government says it will not seek testimony of journalists in Kiriakou prosecution

Emily Miller | Reporter's Privilege | News | July 9, 2012
News
July 9, 2012

The U.S. government announced it will not subpoena journalists as witnesses in the prosecution of a former intelligence officer who allegedly leaked classified information.

Federal appellate court allows former prosecutor to investigate Detroit newspaper's government source

Amanda Simmons | Reporter's Privilege | News | June 27, 2012
News
June 27, 2012

A federal appeals court allowed a former Detroit prosecutor to continue investigating the identity of a source who leaked information about an internal ethics probe against him to a Pulitzer-Prize winning newspaper reporter. The decision, which was released Friday, overturns a district court’s ruling that threw out the case last year and now leaves a newspaper vulnerable to investigations eight years after a U.S. Department of Justice insider leaked information to the reporter.

Indiana court reversed order to identify anonymous posters

Andrea Papagianis | Privacy | Feature | February 23, 2012
Feature
February 23, 2012

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision ordering The Indianapolis Star to reveal the identity of an anonymous commenter who was sued for defamation for comments made on the newspaper’s website.

In the ruling, the court said it weighed the First Amendment rights of the anonymous commenter versus the possible harm caused by the allegedly derogatory statements the commenter made on the website against the former head of a non-profit organization who filed the defamation suit.

Wall Street Journal reporter protected by N.Y. shield law

Chris Healy | Reporter's Privilege | Feature | February 16, 2012
Feature
February 16, 2012

A former reporter for The Wall Street Journal is protected from testifying in a lawsuit between the financial firm Goldman Sachs and a former client, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City (2nd Cir.) ruled yesterday.