SLAPP

A "strategic lawsuit against public participation," or a suit meant to harass someone involved in a public controversy. As a result, many states have adopted anti-SLAPP statutes that help journalists and others get such cases dismissed early.

Defamation suit against Texas man dismissed under state anti-SLAPP law

Lilly Chapa | Libel | News | February 12, 2013
News
February 12, 2013

A vocal Jacinto City, Texas citizen cannot be sued for defamation after repeatedly accusing a police officer of corruption and calling for his firing during city council meetings, a judge ruled Monday, relying on a state anti-SLAPP statute.

Harris County District Judge Elaine Palmer threw out the defamation suit three days after a hearing explored whether Jacinto City Police Sgt. Dennis Walker could sue resident Larry Schion.

Judge dismisses libel suit against Spitzer, Slate

Lilly Chapa | Libel | News | October 2, 2012
News
October 2, 2012

A New York federal judge said in a strong and firm opinion released this week that an article written by former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer about financial and business crimes in the state is not libelous because it is not “of and concerning” the plaintiff.

United States Mission Corporation v. KIRO TV, Inc.

August 17, 2012

The Reporters Committee argues in its amicus brief that Washington's anti-SLAPP statute does not inhibit any First Amendment rights of U.S. Mission because its suit should be considered a strategic lawsuit against public participation, and therefore, without merit.

Federal court denies motion to dismiss anti-SLAPP appeal

Amanda Simmons | Libel | News | July 20, 2012
News
July 20, 2012

An appeal in a defamation case against the late journalist Andrew Breitbart will proceed after a federal appeals court denied a motion to have it dismissed.

Shirley Sherrod, a former official in the Obama administration, sued Breitbart last year, alleging that two writers from his website, BigGovernment.com, defamed her in a YouTube video, which she said unfairly edited a speech she made. Breitbart, a known conservative commentator, died in March.

Anti-SLAPP statute does not protect Calif. lawyer from malicious prosecution claim

Amanda Simmons | Libel | News | June 13, 2012
News
June 13, 2012

A California appeals court ruled Friday that a malicious prosecution lawsuit against a Los Angeles-based attorney may proceed, reversing a lower court's holding that the state's anti-SLAPP statute protected the lawyer.

Judge grants motion to dismiss 'birther' libel case under D.C. Anti-SLAPP Act, First Amendment

Emily Miller | Libel | News | June 5, 2012
News
June 5, 2012

A libel case brought by a 'birther' -- those who question whether President Obama is a natural-born American and eligible to be president -- ended prematurely when a U.S. district judge granted a magazine's motion to dismiss under the D.C. Anti-SLAPP Act, which protects speech relating to issues of public interest.

Libel lawsuit against professional review website dismissed under Wash. anti-SLAPP statute

Andrea Papagianis | Libel | News | April 2, 2012
News
April 2, 2012

The U.S. District Court in Seattle dismissed a lawsuit against a website that profiles and rates lawyers, doctors and dentists across the country under the Washington anti-SLAPP statute.

Federal judge rejects CNN's anti-SLAPP motion in closed captioning lawsuit

Chris Healy | Libel | News | March 29, 2012
News
March 29, 2012

CNN's decision not to include closed captioning services for its online video content was not First Amendment protected conduct, and because of that the company is not entitled to early dismissal of a lawsuit under California's anti-SLAPP statute, a federal judge has ruled.

Md. anti-SLAPP reform bill fails in state Senate

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | March 15, 2012
Feature
March 15, 2012

A bill that would have substantially reformed Maryland's law against strategic lawsuits against public participation, or "SLAPPs," was defeated in the state Senate yesterday by a 25-21 vote.

S.B. 221 would have provided a number of substantial revisions to the law, including removing the requirement that lawsuits be brought in "bad faith" to qualify as SLAPPs, creating clear procedural rules for how to dispose of SLAPPs, and clearly defining what kind of conduct is protected by the law.

Testimony regarding Maryland anti-SLAPP bill

February 15, 2012

Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Executive Director Lucy Dalglish testified before the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee of the Maryland General Assembly, in support of SB 221. which clarifies and modernizes Maryland's anti-SLAPP law. SB 221 offers several important improvements to the current law, including the removal of the requirement that defendants show that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in “bad faith” – that is, with the intent to use it to stifle constitutionally protected expression – in order to have the lawsuit dismissed as a SLAPP.