9th Cir.

Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al., v. Crystal Cox

October 17, 2012

Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, LLC sued blogger Crystal Cox, claiming that Cox libeled them through a series of postings on her Internet blog. The trial court jury ruled in favor of Padrick and Obsidian and returned a $2.5 million verdict in their favor. Cox moved for a new trial, which was denied. The decision in the trial court below turned on whether she was a journalist and whether her speech involved a matter of public concern – both of which affects the standard of liability under Oregon law.

Phoenix alternative newspaper can proceed with suit against Arpaio, court rules

Jack Komperda | Newsgathering | News | August 30, 2012
News
August 30, 2012

Two executives of an alternative Arizona newspaper can continue their civil rights and conspiracy lawsuit against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and a special prosecutor hired to investigate the publication.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco (9th Cir.) reversed a trial court’s dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin, publishers of Phoenix New Times, against Arpaio and Dennis Wilenchik, a former Maricopa County special prosecutor.

Federal appeals court rules against magazine that published copyrighted secret celebrity wedding photos

Amanda Simmons | Content Regulation | News | August 17, 2012
News
August 17, 2012

A federal appellate court ruled that a Spanish-language gossip magazine violated the copyrights of a celebrity couple by publishing private photographs of their secret wedding in a case that according to the court “reads like a telenovela."

Federal judge orders unsealing of documents in ongoing Apple-Samsung patent litigation

Raymond Baldino | Secret Courts | News | July 20, 2012
News
July 20, 2012

A California federal court has ordered documents in a legal battle over smart phones and tablets unsealed -- a departure from the marked increase in the number of civil cases completely or partially sealed in courts nationwide.

Reporters Committee urges federal court to allow challenge of policy that restricts access to court records

Press Release | June 6, 2012
June 6, 2012
Reporters Committee urges federal court to allow challenge of policy that restricts access to court records

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has asked a federal appellate court to reverse a lower court ruling that could severely curtail the news media's ability to challenge state court policies that deny access to judicial proceedings and records.

Courthouse News Service v. Plant

June 5, 2012

Courthouse News Service challenged a policy of the Ventura County, Calif., Superior Court that withholds from public inspection records filed with the court until after the court completes its processing, which takes several days and sometimes much longer. Courthouse News filed an action in federal court, claiming that the procedure violates its First Amendment-based right of public access. The trial court dismissed the case, holding that federal courts should not unduly interfere with pending and future state court proceedings.

Federal appeals court finds right to privacy over death images constitutionally protected

Emily Miller | Privacy | News | May 30, 2012
News
May 30, 2012

A federal appeals court ruled for the first time that the right to privacy over death images is protected under the U.S. Constitution.

Federal appeals court rules IRS may withhold records from fugitives

You-Jin Han | Freedom of Information | Feature | March 15, 2012
Feature
March 15, 2012

A federal court of appeals ruled this week that two fugitives accused of failing to report taxable earnings are not entitled to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) records gathered for use in the criminal investigations against them.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Seattle (9th Cir.) upheld the government’s argument that releasing the requested documents – which included agents’ working papers, a witness list, and internal correspondence – would impede its enforcement proceedings.

Subpoena for Salon reporter in obscenity trial dropped

Haley Behre | Reporter's Privilege | Feature | March 2, 2012
Feature
March 2, 2012

A journalist who was subpoenaed to testify at an obscenity trial for an artist specializing in pornography, will no longer have to testify because the Department of Justice dropped the subpoena without explanation.

Photographer wins appeal over access to horse roundup

Kristen Rasmussen | Newsgathering | Feature | February 14, 2012
Feature
February 14, 2012

A trial court erred when it did not weigh the First Amendment rights of a photojournalist trying to photograph a roundup of wild horses against the government’s interest in restricting her access and newsgathering rights, a federal appeals court ruled today.