North Dakota

N.D. law banning campaigning on Election Day ruled unconstitutional

Lilly Chapa | Prior Restraints | News | November 1, 2012
News
November 1, 2012

A federal judge Wednesday banned the enforcement of a century-old statute that prevents North Dakota citizens from campaigning on Election Day, calling the law “archaic” and “unconstitutional.”

North Dakota

Date: 
August 1, 2012

Summary of statute(s): An individual who is a party to either an in-person conversation or electronic communication, or who has the consent of one of the parties to the communication, can lawfully record it or disclose its contents, unless the person is doing so for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act. N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02 (2011).

N.D. high court considers limiting online court records

J.C. Derrick | Secret Courts | Feature | October 25, 2011
Feature
October 25, 2011

The North Dakota Supreme Court is considering a proposed amendment to its rules that would block public Internet access to certain criminal records, sparking concern over access to court records.

The court held a public meeting on Monday about the proposed rule, which would remove cases from the Internet in which a defendant was acquitted, the case was dismissed, or its paper record is no longer required by law to be kept on file. The rule would only affect electronic files and not paper records.

N.D. Supreme Court orders release of juror names in murder trial

Kathleen Cullinan | Secret Courts | Quicklink | July 9, 2008
Quicklink
July 9, 2008

A North Dakota district judge wrongly refused to release the names of jurors after they convicted a man of murder last year, the state Supreme Court has ruled.

Finding Judge John Paulson's rationale -- that he'd promised not to identify the jurors -- "insufficient to overcome the presumption of public access," the high court unanimously ordered the judge to alert the jurors and then release their names.

They write the rules you may freely disregard.

Corinna Zarek | Secret Courts | Reaction | December 14, 2007
Reaction
December 14, 2007

A North Dakota judge wanted to move a settlement along between the feuding NCAA and the University of North Dakota in a lawsuit over the school's controversial use of its "Fighting Sioux" logo -- the NCAA had alleged the logo to be "racially insensitive" and ordered the university to halt its use of the image. So Judge Lawrence Jahnke ordered records in the case to be sealed, reasoning that if the "divisive" media reports based on the filings ceased, the parties would be free to settle in peace.

And they did.

Reporters Committee asks No. Dak. Supreme Court to open court records

Lucy Dalglish | Secret Courts | Quicklink | November 21, 2007
Quicklink
November 21, 2007

In a friend-of-the-court brief to the North Dakota Supreme Court, the Reporters Committee this week urged the court to issue a directive requiring lower courts in the state to follow specific procedures set forth in the law before sealing records.

Fighting Sioux nickname settlement reached

Secret Courts | Quicklink | October 30, 2007
Quicklink
October 30, 2007

North Dakota’s Board of Higher Education reached a settlement Oct. 26 with the NCAA that gives the University of North Dakota three years to persuade Sioux tribes to support the school's Fighting Sioux nickname.

In September, the judge sealed future court filings in the case to facilitate settlement talks between the parties.

Judge seals documents in 'Fighting Sioux' nickname lawsuit

Secret Courts | Feature | September 24, 2007
Feature
September 24, 2007

Sep. 24, 2007  ·   A judge last week sealed all future documents in a lawsuit challenging an NCAA ban on the University of North Dakota's "Fighting Sioux" nickname, noting that he did so to encourage settlement talks between the parties.

Courts can rely on persuasive attorney general opinions

Freedom of Information | Feature | January 11, 2007
Feature
January 11, 2007

NEWS MEDIA UPDATE   ·   NORTH DAKOTA   ·   Freedom of Information   ·   Jan. 11, 2007