R2

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

The Sunshine Law expressly states that it is to be liberally construed to promote the policy of open government, and that exceptions are to be strictly construed. Mo.Rev.Stat. §  610.011(1). See also, e.g., Great Rivers Environmental Law Center v. City of St. Peters, 290 S.W.3d 732 (Mo.Ct.App. 2009) (exceptions are to be strictly construed); Tipton v. Barton, 747 S.W.2d 325, 330 (Mo.Ct.App. 1988) (exceptions set forth in the Sunshine Law are to be narrowly construed); MacLachlan v. McNary, 684 S.W.2d 534, 537 (Mo.Ct.App.

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

Exemptions are clearly the exception under Georgia's statute. "The underlying implication" of the Act "is that all records of all state, county and municipal authorities are open to public inspection unless closed by a specific exception." Doe v. Sears, 245 Ga. 83, 263 S.E.2d 119 (1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 979 (1980). "[A]ny purported statutory exemption from disclosure under the Open Records Act must be narrowly construed." Hardaway Co. v. Rives, 262 Ga. 631, 422 S.E.2d 854 (1992) (emphasis in original); City of Brunswick v.

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

(This section is blank. See the subpoints below.)

All public records are subject to inspection and copying unless otherwise expressly provided by statute. Idaho Code § 9-338(1). Idaho has listed actual types of records exempt from public disclosure.