Bankruptcy

Judge denies blogger retrial in Oregon defamation case

Rachel Bunn | Libel | News | April 3, 2012
News
April 3, 2012

A federal judge denied a motion for retrial in the case of a self-described investigative blogger, ruling that private figure plaintiffs do not have to establish “negligence” or “actual malice” to hold a non-media defendant liable in a defamation suit arising out of speech not on a matter of public concern.

Blog's context suggests that posts are protected opinion

Kristen Rasmussen | Libel | Feature | August 24, 2011
Feature
August 24, 2011

An Oregon blogger’s disparaging “almost stream of consciousness-like” statements about the trustee in a bankruptcy case are protected opinion under the First Amendment, a federal judge in Portland recently ruled.

The opinion in Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox highlights the importance of courts’ consideration of the “looser, more relaxed communication style” of the Internet in their evaluations of allegedly defamatory online communications.

Media groups seek access to files in Madoff-related case

Kacey Deamer | Secret Courts | Feature | January 28, 2011
Feature
January 28, 2011

NBC Universal, on behalf of its affiliate station WNBC-TV, and The New York Times Co. have asked to intervene in a bankruptcy proceeding concerning investors in Bernard Madoff's company in order to gain access to key court documents.