Broadcast regulation

High court weighs constitutionality of broadcast regulation

Haley Behre | Content Regulation | Feature | January 10, 2012
Feature
January 10, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court weighed arguments Tuesday in a case that challenges the federal government's policy of regulating broadcast indecency, but has the potential to drastically change how the media industry is regulated.

At issue in FCC v. Fox is the Federal Communications Commission's indecency policy, which broadcast television networks claim provides no guidance as to what material is indecent -- making it unclear what is subject to fines and what is not.

Reporters Committee argues that FCC's indecency enforcement threatens news reporting

Press Release | November 11, 2011
November 11, 2011

Enforcement of Federal Communications Commission policy regulating indecent programming on the public airwaves severely restrains the ability of broadcast journalists to report on matters of public interest and concern, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press arguedin a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Networks challenge indecency regulations in appeals

Ansley Schrimpf | Content Regulation | Feature | September 18, 2009
Feature
September 18, 2009

The Federal Communication Commmission's battle over fines for controversial moments during awards shows and the Superbowl continues, as briefs were filed this week in two separate cases about what constitutes a "fleeting expletive" -- unscripted spontaneous profanity in a live broadcast -- under the agency's indecency regulations.

Supreme Court upholds fleeting expletive ban

Samantha Fredrickson | Content Regulation | Feature | April 28, 2009
Feature
April 28, 2009

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a government policy of sanctioning television networks for one-time utterances of fleeting expletives on live prime-time television.

Supreme Court hears arguments in indecency case

Samantha Fredrickson | Content Regulation | Feature | November 4, 2008
Feature
November 4, 2008

With all the chuckles, celebrity comments and linguistic explorations into the meaning of the word “fuck,” the oral arguments Tuesday in FCC v. Fox at the Supreme Court at times had the air of a comedy show.

But interwoven among the lighter moments was a weighty discussion about broadcast regulation and the legal and policy implications of the FCC’s move toward fining television stations for one-time use of fleeting expletives.

Supreme Court to hear arguments over expletives

Samantha Fredrickson | Content Regulation | Feature | November 3, 2008
Feature
November 3, 2008

If anyone is anxiously awaiting to hear “fuck” echo through the Supreme Court chambers during oral arguments in Tuesday’s fleeting expletive case, they’re going to have to attend the session or sit tight for a few months.

Between candidates and '527s', broadcast stations get caught

Jason Wiederin | Content Regulation | Quicklink | September 26, 2008
Quicklink
September 26, 2008

With election day bearing down, and third-party political groups gobbling up advertising time on the airwaves, The Wall Street Journal reports today that candidates' lawyers are increasingly responding with take-down notices -- all leaving broadcasters in the crossfire.

FCC Super Bowl fine out of bounds, court says

Stacey Laskin | Content Regulation | Feature | July 21, 2008
Feature
July 21, 2008

A federal appeals court today decided CBS Corp. will not have to pay a $550,000 fine for the 2004 Super Bowl half-time show’s “wardrobe malfunction.”

In the half-time show, pop singer Justin Timberlake reached for Janet Jackson's costume as he sang the lyrics, "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song." A moment later, Timberlake tugged on the fabric, and millions of Americans watched Janet Jackson's breast flash across their television screens.

DOJ takes Fox to court over FCC fines

Alanna Malone | Content Regulation | Quicklink | April 7, 2008
Quicklink
April 7, 2008

Following Fox Broadcasting Co.’s announcement at the end of last month that it would not comply with FCC fines, the Justice Department has sued the company to collect the $56,000 indecency fee.

ABC challenges FCC fines

Alison Schmidt | Content Regulation | Quicklink | February 22, 2008
Quicklink
February 22, 2008

ABC appealed a $1.24 million fine from the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday, arguing that the decision was  "arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law; contrary to the Communications Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the commission's own rules, standards and precedents; and unconstitutional."