Defamation

Saying prisoner was gang member is substantially true

Clara Hogan | Libel | Feature | July 25, 2011
Feature
July 25, 2011

A statement that someone is a member of a certain prison gang, when he merely conspired with its members, is substantially true and therefore protected against a defamation suit, a Colorado federal appellate court ruled this month.

Federal court finds prosecutor violated blogger's civil rights

Aaron Mackey | Libel | Feature | June 3, 2011
Feature
June 3, 2011

A Colorado prosecutor violated a student blogger’s constitutional rights when she approved a search warrant of his mother's home over a criminal libel allegation, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

Separate look at each charge needed to overcome privilege

Kristen Rasmussen | Reporter's Privilege | Feature | May 9, 2011
Feature
May 9, 2011

A West Virginia trial judge erred when she ordered a newspaper to reveal the identities of anonymous sources and documents in a defamation suit against the paper, the state’s highest court recently ruled.

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia returned the case to the lower court, which must identify and analyze each allegedly defamatory statement and the confidential source who made the statement separately.

Court allows bank manager's defamation claim to proceed

Kacey Deamer | Libel | Feature | February 15, 2011
Feature
February 15, 2011

A California appellate court last week affirmed a lower court ruling that a bank manager presented enough evidence to allow his defamation claim against McGraw-Hill to proceed, thus rejecting the publisher's anti-SLAPP argument. The manager alleged that he was defamed by statements about the mortgage crisis in a BusinessWeek article.

Court allows libel suit to proceed without proof of damages

Rosemary Lane | Libel | Feature | September 30, 2010
Feature
September 30, 2010

A New Jersey appellate court ruled Monday that a man involved in a defamation suit regarding online child sexual abuse accusations will be allowed to proceed without proving damages, an unusual move departing from the standard of requiring proof of damages in defamation suits.

Senate committee passes libel tourism prevention bill

Cristina Abello | Libel | Feature | July 13, 2010
Feature
July 13, 2010

The Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday morning unanimously passed bipartisan legislation aimed at protecting authors and journalists from libel lawsuits filed abroad.

Pennsylvania high court overturns $3.5m defamation verdict

Kirk Davis | Libel | Quicklink | November 5, 2009
Quicklink
November 5, 2009

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned a $3.5 million defamation verdict against Wilkes-Barre's The Citizens' Voice and ordered a new trial after finding the original trial may have been fixed by two former judges and a reputed crime boss, the Times Leader reported.

N.J. high court to decide future of state "fair report" privilege

Cristina Abello | Libel | Quicklink | October 14, 2009
Quicklink
October 14, 2009

The New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in the appeal of a 2008 libel ruling that considerably narrowed the state’s “fair report” privilege that protects journalists who report on information contained in court filings, Newark's The Star-Ledger reported.

Jury finds for libel defendant in case over truth as defense

Cristina Abello | Libel | Quicklink | October 13, 2009
Quicklink
October 13, 2009

A Massachusetts jury has decided that a truthful mass e-mail criticizing the former employee of an office supply company is not libelous because it was not sent with actual malice, Law.com reports. The verdict was the latest round in a case that questioned well-established libel jurisprudence when a federal appeals court found that the truth can still be libelous.

Dear Elmer Fudd: Respond to subpoena or be revealed

Ansley Schrimpf | Libel | Quicklink | September 24, 2009
Quicklink
September 24, 2009

A South Carolina newspaper alerted an anonymous online commenter that he or she has until Oct. 2 to respond to a Myrtle Beach Chamber of Commerce subpoena or the newspaper will hand over the commenter’s identity.