FCC

Supreme Court ruling avoids constitutionality of FCC's indecency policy

Amanda Simmons | Content Regulation | News | June 21, 2012
News
June 21, 2012

In a narrowly decided opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously threw out millions of dollars in fines the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) imposed on broadcasters but did not address the First Amendment implications of the agency's indecency policy.

FCC fines broadcast company for violating telephone broadcast rule, despite conversation not being aired

Emily Miller | Content Regulation | News | May 25, 2012
News
May 25, 2012

A Maryland radio station and its parent company was fined $2,000 by the Federal Communications Commission for recording the beginning of a telephone conversation without getting prior permission, even though the recording was never broadcast.

High court weighs constitutionality of broadcast regulation

Haley Behre | Content Regulation | Feature | January 10, 2012
Feature
January 10, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court weighed arguments Tuesday in a case that challenges the federal government's policy of regulating broadcast indecency, but has the potential to drastically change how the media industry is regulated.

At issue in FCC v. Fox is the Federal Communications Commission's indecency policy, which broadcast television networks claim provides no guidance as to what material is indecent -- making it unclear what is subject to fines and what is not.

Reporters Committee argues that FCC's indecency enforcement threatens news reporting

Press Release | November 11, 2011
November 11, 2011

Enforcement of Federal Communications Commission policy regulating indecent programming on the public airwaves severely restrains the ability of broadcast journalists to report on matters of public interest and concern, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press arguedin a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. Supreme Court: Corporations have no personal privacy

Christine Beckett | Freedom of Information | Feature | March 1, 2011
Feature
March 1, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the concept of corporate personal privacy in its decision today in FCC v. AT&T, Inc. AT&T sued to keep records withheld from disclosure under Exemption 7(c) of the Freedom of Information Act, which protects against the unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. AT&T claimed personal privacy protections extend to corporations. In a unanimous decision, the court held that Exemption 7(c) applied to individuals only.

Court strikes down indecency fine for "NYPD Blue" nudity

Peter Haldis | Content Regulation | Feature | January 4, 2011
Feature
January 4, 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals in New York (2nd Cir.) vacated Tuesday a $1.2 million indecency fine the Federal Communications Commission levied against ABC for nudity in a 2003 episode of “NYPD Blue.”

The decision comes in light of the court’s ruling in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC last July that the FCC’s indecency policy is “unconstitutionally vague."

FCC considers reclassification of Internet in push to regulate it

Christine Beckett | Content Regulation | Quicklink | April 15, 2010
Quicklink
April 15, 2010

The Federal Communications Commission has been exploring ways to reassert its  authority over the Internet after last week's federal appellate court decision cast doubt on whether the commission has the authority to enforce its net neutrality policy.

Federal appeals court vacates FCC's decision on net neutrality

Nadia Tamez-Robledo | Content Regulation | Quicklink | April 6, 2010
Quicklink
April 6, 2010

A federal appeals court ruled today that the Federal Communications Commission does not have the authority to order an Internet service provider to change its management policies.

CBS fights FCC fine for 2004 Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction

Curry Andrews | Content Regulation | Quicklink | February 24, 2010
Quicklink
February 24, 2010

CBS returned to a Philadelphia appeals court on Tuesday to fight $550,000 in penalties for a 2004 Super Bowl broadcast that showed performer Janet Jackson's breast for nearly a half second, The New York Times reported.

Corporations can claim personal privacy interest

Miranda Fleschert | Freedom of Information | Feature | September 25, 2009
Feature
September 25, 2009

Corporations can have a "personal privacy" interest that can cause their records to be withheld from government release under a Freedom of Information Act request, a federal appellate court found on Sept. 22.