Fleeting expletives

Reporters Committee argues that FCC's indecency enforcement threatens news reporting

Press Release | November 11, 2011
November 11, 2011

Enforcement of Federal Communications Commission policy regulating indecent programming on the public airwaves severely restrains the ability of broadcast journalists to report on matters of public interest and concern, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press arguedin a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court.

CBS fights FCC fine for 2004 Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction

Curry Andrews | Content Regulation | Quicklink | February 24, 2010
Quicklink
February 24, 2010

CBS returned to a Philadelphia appeals court on Tuesday to fight $550,000 in penalties for a 2004 Super Bowl broadcast that showed performer Janet Jackson's breast for nearly a half second, The New York Times reported.

CBS 'wardrobe malfunction' case remanded

Kathleen Cullinan | Content Regulation | Feature | May 4, 2009
Feature
May 4, 2009

A federal appeals court must reconsider its ruling vacating a $550,000 FCC fine against CBS over Janet Jackson's televised 2004 "wardrobe malfunction," the Supreme Court ordered Monday.

Supreme Court upholds fleeting expletive ban

Samantha Fredrickson | Content Regulation | Feature | April 28, 2009
Feature
April 28, 2009

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a government policy of sanctioning television networks for one-time utterances of fleeting expletives on live prime-time television.

Supreme Court hears arguments in indecency case

Samantha Fredrickson | Content Regulation | Feature | November 4, 2008
Feature
November 4, 2008

With all the chuckles, celebrity comments and linguistic explorations into the meaning of the word “fuck,” the oral arguments Tuesday in FCC v. Fox at the Supreme Court at times had the air of a comedy show.

But interwoven among the lighter moments was a weighty discussion about broadcast regulation and the legal and policy implications of the FCC’s move toward fining television stations for one-time use of fleeting expletives.

Supreme Court asked to review FCC profanity decision

Content Regulation | Quicklink | November 1, 2007
Quicklink
November 1, 2007

U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement Thursday filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to reverse a decision by a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which in June rejected the Federal Communications Commission's policy on fleeting expletives.

The appeals court found that the FCC had not supported its position that isolated and sometimes unintentional language, often on live broadcasts, can make a program indecent and result in penalties for broadcasters.