Government records

Alaska Supreme Court rules private e-mail messages are public records

Lilly Chapa | Freedom of Information | News | October 15, 2012
News
October 15, 2012

An Alaska Supreme Court decision makes private e-mail messages containing government business subject to the state Public Records Act but also makes obtaining those records difficult.

Friday's ruling held that the state Public Records Act does not prohibit public officials from conducting government business through their private e-mail accounts, potentially posing difficulties for people seeking to access those messages in the future, Alaska media lawyer D. John McKay said in an interview.

Judge denies media's request to film and photograph Monday's hearing of Colorado shooting suspect

Raymond Baldino | Secret Courts | News | July 27, 2012
News
July 27, 2012

A Colorado judge denied the media's request to film and photograph Monday's hearing of the man accused of killing 12 and wounding 58 people at an Aurora movie theater last week.

Arapahoe County District Court Judge William Sylvester has ordered that no cameras or audio recording be allowed at James Holmes' July 30 hearing where charges are expected to be filed against him. The order is part of a broader trend of restrictions issued by Sylvester limiting press coverage in the Colorado shooting.

Penn. court holds agency wrongfully ignored records request because they were requested incorrectly

Raymond Baldino | Freedom of Information | News | June 14, 2012
News
June 14, 2012

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held Monday that written requests for records that do not comply with certain agency-specific request policies cannot merely be ignored.

Penn. high court orders release of bids received by private company in operating public stadium

Amanda Simmons | Freedom of Information | News | May 30, 2012
News
May 30, 2012

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled yesterday that records of a private entity acting on behalf of a public agency may be subject to the state’s open records laws.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Secret Service

May 8, 2012

RCFP, along with eleven other organizations, signed on to an amicus brief in a case before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia urging the court to find that U.S. Secret Service White House complex visitor logs are "agency records" under the federal Freedom of Information Act and that the Secret Service is required to process a request for such records in compliance with FOIA.

Conn. appeals court interprets open records provision on use of document scanners

You-Jin Han | Freedom of Information | News | May 3, 2012
News
May 3, 2012

The Connecticut Appellate Court ruled this week that a state open records law provision permitting records requesters to use “hand-held scanner[s]” to copy records excludes the use of flatbed scanners. Under the court's interpretation of the statute, requesters seeking to scan public records using their own scanning devices may now be limited to using those that are actually "hand-held."

Proposed Fla. bill shields legislators from civil court

Rachel Bunn | Content Regulation | Feature | February 21, 2012
Feature
February 21, 2012

Update: A House committee announced late Monday that the bill would not be considered, after a prominent senator announced he would not support it.

FBI FOIA response was official confirmation of informant's status

Rachel Bunn | Freedom of Information | Feature | February 1, 2012
Feature
February 1, 2012

The FBI cannot cite an exclusion provision related to confidential informants under the federal Freedom of Information Act regarding a request for records about civil rights era photographer Ernest Withers after the bureau was found to have officially confirmed Withers was an informant through a records release, a federal district court in Washington, D.C. ruled Tuesday.

Reporters Committee asks U.S. Marshals Service to explain latest statement on mug shots

Press Release | January 4, 2012
January 4, 2012

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has written to the U.S. Marshals Service asking it to clarify its position on the release of federal booking photographs under the federal Freedom of Information Act. Specifically, the Reporters Committee inquired into future access policies within the geographic bounds of the Sixth Circuit where a federal appeals court ruled in 1996 that these mug shots are public documents. The letter was co-signed by 21 leading news media companies and organizations.

Reporters Committee argues for release of voter records in federal appeals court brief

Press Release | October 21, 2011
October 21, 2011

Voter registration applications are public records under federal law that cannot be withheld from release simply because of an arbitrary promise of secrecy by state officials, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press argued in a friend-of-the-court brief filed today.