Internet

Virginia Supreme Court reverses injunction against online commenter

Jack Komperda | Prior Restraints | News | January 4, 2013
News
January 4, 2013

A Virginia woman being sued by her home contractor for libel won't have to remove negative comments she posted on Internet review sites about him, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled.

The state’s high court reversed a Fairfax County Circuit Court judge’s ruling ordering Jane Perez to delete portions of her review of the contractor on Yelp and Angie’s List. In her review, Perez mentioned that her jewelry was missing. She also referenced the outcome of a suit brought by the contractor against Perez for nonpayment.

Businessman can pursue defamation suit without showing proof of monetary loss, N.Y. appeals court rules

Lilly Chapa | Libel | News | December 14, 2012
News
December 14, 2012

A man accused of throwing a severed horse head in a local politician's pool does not have to prove monetary loss to pursue a defamation lawsuit against his online accusers, an appellate court in New York ruled.

Google's latest transparency report shows government surveillance on the rise in U.S.

Lilly Chapa | Privacy | News | November 19, 2012
News
November 19, 2012

Paula Broadwell isn’t the only person whose Gmail messages were read by government officials – Google received almost 8,000 e-mail access requests from U.S. state and federal governments in the past six months, according to the latest Google Transparency Report.

Google fully or partially granted 90 percent of the requests made by federal, state and local U.S. governments, according to the report. The requests by stateside governments account for more than a third of requests worldwide.

Kansas Supreme Court allows live streaming, tweeting from state courtrooms

Lilly Chapa | Newsgathering | News | November 8, 2012
News
November 8, 2012

An amendment to Kansas court rules now lets journalists use laptops and cell phones to report from the courtroom.

Reporters still need permission from the presiding judge, but the recent amendment to Rule 1001 clarifies that such devices may be used by journalists. Before the amendment was added, there was no mention of laptops or smartphones in the rule, and judges assumed such devices were not permitted, according to court spokesman Ron Keefover.

OWS protester argues that First and Fourth Amendments apply to tweets

Lilly Chapa | Reporter's Privilege | News | October 9, 2012
News
October 9, 2012

An Occupy Wall Street protester is challenging a court’s decision requiring his tweets to be handed over to New York prosecutors, arguing that his First and Fourth Amendment rights should apply to tweets like they would to information stored on a personal computer or phone.

Twitter hands over subpoenaed records in Occupy Wall Street prosecution

Lilly Chapa | Reporter's Privilege | News | September 14, 2012
News
September 14, 2012

Twitter complied today with a court order to hand over to New York prosecutors an Occupy Wall Street protester’s tweets and subscriber information.

Twitter faces looming deadline on court order to reveal user's information

Lilly Chapa | Reporter's Privilege | News | September 13, 2012
News
September 13, 2012

After a state appellate court earlier this week denied Twitter's request to stay the proceedings, lawyers for the social networking company argued that disclosing an Occupy Wall Street protester's tweets and subscriber information would negatively affect those who use the social media service.

Tech companies in lawsuit must identify paid journalists and bloggers, federal court rules

Amanda Simmons | Content Regulation | News | August 15, 2012
News
August 15, 2012

Media advocates are concerned about a federal court order that compels two technology companies involved in a drawn-out patent infringement lawsuit to disclose the names of writers they paid to comment about the case.

Google and Oracle, a computer technology corporation, have until Friday to identify any journalists or bloggers they paid for writing about the case, ruled Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

Website with links to infringing videos does not violate copyright laws, court rules

Amanda Simmons | Content Regulation | News | August 3, 2012
News
August 3, 2012

A social media website on which users have provided links to copyrighted videos from third-party servers has not itself violated copyright laws, a federal court ruled yesterday.

Although the case involves copyright claims for adult entertainment videos originally made by Flava Works, a gay pornography production company, the court’s ruling could also affect online news publishers that embed or link to other kinds of copied content.

Federal appeals court orders reconsideration of Rosetta Stone's trademark claims against Google

You-Jin Han | Content Regulation | News | April 10, 2012
News
April 10, 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., (4th Cir.) ordered a lower court yesterday to reconsider several of Rosetta Stone’s claims against Google over the search engine's use of trademarks in its web advertising platform.