Legislators

Md. anti-SLAPP reform bill fails in state Senate

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | March 15, 2012
Feature
March 15, 2012

A bill that would have substantially reformed Maryland's law against strategic lawsuits against public participation, or "SLAPPs," was defeated in the state Senate yesterday by a 25-21 vote.

S.B. 221 would have provided a number of substantial revisions to the law, including removing the requirement that lawsuits be brought in "bad faith" to qualify as SLAPPs, creating clear procedural rules for how to dispose of SLAPPs, and clearly defining what kind of conduct is protected by the law.

Proposed Fla. bill shields legislators from civil court

Rachel Bunn | Content Regulation | Feature | February 21, 2012
Feature
February 21, 2012

Update: A House committee announced late Monday that the bill would not be considered, after a prominent senator announced he would not support it.

California assembly ordered to release budget data

You-Jin Han | Freedom of Information | Feature | December 5, 2011
Feature
December 5, 2011

The Superior Court of California for the county of Sacramento entered an order Friday ruling that the California assembly – the lower house of the state legislature – must release budget-related records to news organizations under the state’s Legislative Open Records Act.

Supreme Court rules legislative votes not protected speech

Derek Green | Prior Restraints | Feature | June 13, 2011
Feature
June 13, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that a legislator’s act of casting a legislative vote is not protected personal speech for First Amendment purposes. The Court’s opinion reverses a decision by the Nevada Supreme Court, which had held that a state recusal law infringed on the free speech rights of local legislators.

Reporters Committee position that governance is not speech prevails at high court

Press Release | June 13, 2011
June 13, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that requiring elected officials to recuse themselves from governance votes on issues where they have a conflict of interest does not violate First Amendment free speech rights, endorsing a position put forth in a friend-of-the-court brief by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

High court considers First Amendment role in official votes

Kacey Deamer | Prior Restraints | Feature | April 27, 2011
Feature
April 27, 2011

In the final oral argument of the term, the U.S. Supreme Court considered today whether recusal rules interfere with First Amendment rights legislators may have in their legislative votes. Some of the justices' questions in Nevada Commission on Ethics v.