Personally identifying information

Ohio high court orders partial release of toxicity records

You-Jin Han | Freedom of Information | Feature | January 20, 2012
Feature
January 20, 2012

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled Thursday that with respect to agency records related to lead poisoning, only portions that do not have “personal identifying information” can be released under the Ohio Public Records Act.

DEA agent fails to prove viral video violated Privacy Act

Rachel Bunn | Privacy | Feature | January 18, 2012
Feature
January 18, 2012

The disclosure of a video showing a U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration officer accidentally shooting himself in the leg during a lecture to community youths does not violate the federal Privacy Act, a U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday. The court also rejected the officer's claim for invasion of privacy under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Oklahoma high court rejects rule requiring redacted filings

Kristen Rasmussen | Secret Courts | Feature | December 16, 2011
Feature
December 16, 2011

The Oklahoma Supreme Court earlier this week nixed a proposed rule that would have severely limited personal information contained in court records in favor of one that allows, but does not require, the omission of basic identifying data.

Reporters Committee argues for release of voter records in federal appeals court brief

Press Release | October 21, 2011
October 21, 2011

Voter registration applications are public records under federal law that cannot be withheld from release simply because of an arbitrary promise of secrecy by state officials, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press argued in a friend-of-the-court brief filed today.

University should not hide behind student privacy to withhold secret admissions records, Reporters Committee argues

Press Release | August 19, 2011
August 19, 2011

Records related to a secret admission process at the University of Illinois that favored applicants with ties to large donors and the politically connected cannot be considered confidential student education records exempt from public release, according to a friend-of-the-court brief filed today in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago (7th Cir.) by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Appeals court says posting of personal data is free speech

Cristina Abello | Privacy | Feature | July 29, 2010
Feature
July 29, 2010

A Virginia woman who protested the government's perceived mismanagement of sensitive personal data by posting unredacted information from government documents online can continue her crusade, a federal appeals court has ruled.

Supreme Court to decide whether to release petitioner names

Curry Andrews | Privacy | Quicklink | January 19, 2010
Quicklink
January 19, 2010

The Supreme Court on Friday said it would decide whether Washington state officials can release the names of people who signed a petition to overturn a state law that allows same-sex domestic partnerships, The Washington Post reported.

Appeals court releases its opinion on release of petition signers

Miranda Fleschert | Freedom of Information | Quicklink | October 26, 2009
Quicklink
October 26, 2009

On the heels of a Supreme Court ruling that temporarily blocked the release of the names of people who petitioned to repeal a same-sex marriage law in Washington state, the appeals court has released its rationale for its earlier order to disclose the names.

Supreme Court halts release of petition signers in Washington state

Kirk Davis | Privacy | Quicklink | October 21, 2009
Quicklink
October 21, 2009

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked the release of the names of people who petitioned to overturn a Washington state law that gives benefits to same-sex couples, Scotusblog reported.

Texas again tries to limit access to public employee information

Dana Liebelson | Privacy | Quicklink | April 27, 2009
Quicklink
April 27, 2009

The Texas House passed a bill Thursday restricting access to school district employees' birth dates and other information, according to the Associated Press.

The privacy measure is part of a wider effort to conceal the personal information about public employees. Supporters of both moves say they are meant to prevent identity theft.