Public officials

Texas Open Meetings Act does not unconstitutionally restrain government officials' speech, Reporters Committee argues

Press Release | October 27, 2011
October 27, 2011

The Framers of the U.S. Constitution did not intend the First Amendment to protect government officials’ ability to meet in secret, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press argued in a friend-of-the-court brief filed today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Reporters Committee position that governance is not speech prevails at high court

Press Release | June 13, 2011
June 13, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that requiring elected officials to recuse themselves from governance votes on issues where they have a conflict of interest does not violate First Amendment free speech rights, endorsing a position put forth in a friend-of-the-court brief by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Reporting a rumor does not require investigating its truth

Kristen Rasmussen | Libel | Feature | May 20, 2011
Feature
May 20, 2011

Newspaper reports about a rumor regarding a local city councilman’s personal relationship with a woman who received a “sweetheart deal” to perform a project for the city were not defamatory, an Alabama appellate court recently held.

N.C. judge orders blog to disclose anonymous commenters

Cristina Abello | Libel | Feature | July 1, 2010
Feature
July 1, 2010

A North Carolina judge has ordered an online-news editor to produce the names of six anonymous posters who allegedly posted defamatory comments on his website, although one of them identified himself this morning on a local AM radio station.

Justices say government employers can audit employee texts

Mara Zimmerman | Privacy | Feature | June 17, 2010
Feature
June 17, 2010

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a police department had the authority to search an officer's text messages that were sent using a department-issued pager.

Police Sergeant Jeff Quon could not reasonably "conclude that his messages were in all circumstances immune from scrutiny," wrote Justice Anthony M. Kennedy for the court. Though the court’s ruling was unanimous, two justices wrote separate opinions explaining their reasoning.

Texas mayor drops libel suit for $50,000 and a retraction

Cristina Abello | Libel | Quicklink | February 17, 2010
Quicklink
February 17, 2010

A Texas man who took out an ad that said a former mayor broke laws in a city land acquisition must pay damages of $50,000 and take out an ad that retracts his allegations as part of a settlement, The Keller Citizen reported.

New York paper fights website commenter subpoena

Cristina Abello | Newsgathering | Quicklink | November 16, 2009
Quicklink
November 16, 2009

A New York newspaper is engaged in a battle to quash a grand jury subpoena for the identities of some of its website commenters.

Forward thinking again, that Iowa

Corinna Zarek | Freedom of Information | Quicklink | May 7, 2009
Quicklink
May 7, 2009

Iowa Gov. Chet Culver said he will allow the public to see e-mail he sent privately in his first two years in office -- even as counterparts in other states fight for the opposite result.

Murtha's immunity claim upheld in defamation suit

Kathleen Cullinan | Libel | Feature | April 14, 2009
Feature
April 14, 2009

A defamation lawsuit against U.S. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) is set to be dismissed after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.) ruled Tuesday that the plaintiff had not shown that Murtha's disputed comments to news reporters went beyond the bounds of his job.

Murtha, faced with defamation suit, asserts immunity

Jason Wiederin | Libel | Quicklink | November 20, 2008
Quicklink
November 20, 2008

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C. Cir.) heard oral arguments this week over whether Rep. John Murtha should have to testify in a defamation lawsuit he faces over his 2006 comments about the slaying of Iraqi civilians in Haditha.