Punitive damages

New Jersey Supreme Court limits libel damages, distinguishes online speech

Raymond Baldino | Libel | News | May 17, 2012
News
May 17, 2012

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a defamation suit over online accusations of child sexual abuse could still proceed, even though the plaintiff could not show he was harmed.

The decision upheld a 2010 appeals court ruling that New Jersey First Amendment attorneys hoped would lead to a change in the law by the state's Supreme Court.

Reporter's testimony wrongly excluded, Eighth Circuit rules

Chris Healy | Reporter's Privilege | Feature | January 4, 2012
Feature
January 4, 2012

The court could have compelled a reporter to testify as a witness in a patient's lawsuit against her plastic surgeons who handed over her partially nude photographs to a Missouri newspaper, a federal court of appeals has ruled.

Colo. Supreme Court ruling could increase punitive damages

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | December 16, 2011
Feature
December 16, 2011

A ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court could result in higher punitive damages for libel defendants in that state. In a decision released this week, the court clarified how interest rates will be factored into assessing punitive damages.

Minn. TV station liable for $1 million in defamation suit

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | November 8, 2011
Feature
November 8, 2011

In what may be the largest defamation verdict in Minnesota history, a jury found that a Minneapolis TV news station acted with "constitutional malice" and awarded a naturopathic healer $1 million.

The jury found that the ABC news affiliate, KSTP, acted with reckless disregard for the truth when it ran a report more than two years ago about healer Susan Anderson and advice she allegedly gave her client, Cheryl Blaha.

Florida hospital must pay $5 million to doctor in slander suit

Cristina Abello | Libel | Quicklink | March 31, 2010
Quicklink
March 31, 2010

A Florida appellate court this week ruled that a hospital whose chief executive stated that a former employee was not even fit to perform surgery on a dog is liable for punitive damages – to the tune of $5 million.