Libel

This section covers the state law governing libel suits. The standards governing such suits are influenced by many things, including whether the subject of a story is a public figure or public official. This also covers the defenses to libel suits, including the "fair report" privilege, the opinion defense and anti-SLAPP laws.

D.C. anti-SLAPP law does not apply in federal court

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | February 6, 2012
Feature
February 6, 2012

The special motion to strike provided by D.C.'s anti-SLAPP law, which became effective in March of last year, is unavailable to defendants sued in federal court, the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. ruled last week.

Libelous truth?

Fifteen years later, a libel suit finally ends.
Cover Story
Page Number: 
8

AP PHOTO BY GREG GIBSON

Photographers surround Richard Jewell prior to his testifying before a Congressional hearing.

Illinois defamation suit not dismissible on anti-SLAPP

Rachel Bunn | Libel | Feature | January 24, 2012
Feature
January 24, 2012

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that a defamation suit filed by a high school basketball coach against about a dozen critics is not subject for dismissal under Illinois’ Citizen Participation Act, a statue aimed to prevent Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP).

Local weekly protected by privilege, Md. high court rules

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | January 24, 2012
Feature
January 24, 2012

The Maryland Court of Appeals ruled this week that the Baltimore City Paper was protected by reporting privileges when it published information from the court record of a grisly, local murder trial -- information not used during the trial and potentially implicating another person not tried for the crime.

D.C. court rules in favor of anonymous speech

Haley Behre | Libel | Feature | January 18, 2012
Feature
January 18, 2012

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals set a precedent for balancing a speaker's right to anonymous speech with a plaintiff's right to pursue a defamation claim on January 12, when it ruled that a trade association didn’t have to disclose the name of an anonymous tipster.

Georgia's highest court won't review Jewell libel case

Andrea Papagianis | Libel | Feature | January 11, 2012
Feature
January 11, 2012

Earlier this week the Georgia Supreme Court declined to review a lower court decision in the long-running libel case against The Atlanta Journal-Constitution filed by Richard Jewell, who was wrongfully accused of the 1996 Olympic Park bombing, and carried on by his family since his death in 2007.

Colo. Supreme Court ruling could increase punitive damages

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | December 16, 2011
Feature
December 16, 2011

A ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court could result in higher punitive damages for libel defendants in that state. In a decision released this week, the court clarified how interest rates will be factored into assessing punitive damages.

Amicus Brief in Neely v. Wilson

December 15, 2011

Urging the Supreme Court of Texas to uphold the state's third-party allegation rule protecting journalists who fairly and accurately report the positions of opposing parties in newsworthy events.

Reporters Committee urges Texas court to uphold protection for reporting third-party allegations

Press Release | December 15, 2011
December 15, 2011

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed a friend of the court brief urging the Texas Supreme Court to uphold a state law that protects journalists who accurately report on allegations made by third parties, even if those accusations ultimately are found to be false. The Texas Association of Broadcasters joined the brief.

Eight year Howling Pig litigation ends in $425K settlement

Chris Healy | Libel | Feature | December 14, 2011
Feature
December 14, 2011

Students doctored a photo of a professor for a satirical magazine.