Prior Restraints

This section covers official government restrictions of speech prior to publication. Prior restraints are viewed by the U.S. Supreme Court as “the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights," which repeatedly has found that such restraints are presumed unconstitutional. Restraints on Internet speech follow the same rules, although particular speech can often be restrained if it has already been adjudged as libelous.

Reporters Committee lauds U.S. Supreme Court ruling on violent video games

Press Release | June 27, 2011
June 27, 2011

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press lauded the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Monday that declared a California law restricting the sale or rental of violent video games to minors is an unconstitutional limit on freedom of speech.

Restricting the use of prescription data infringes free speech

Derek Green | Prior Restraints | Feature | June 23, 2011
Feature
June 23, 2011

Restricting the sale, disclosure and use of prescription drug data for marketing purposes runs headlong into the First Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today.

Supreme Court rules legislative votes not protected speech

Derek Green | Prior Restraints | Feature | June 13, 2011
Feature
June 13, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that a legislator’s act of casting a legislative vote is not protected personal speech for First Amendment purposes. The Court’s opinion reverses a decision by the Nevada Supreme Court, which had held that a state recusal law infringed on the free speech rights of local legislators.

Tenn. law could criminalize offensive Web images

Aaron Mackey | Prior Restraints | Feature | June 9, 2011
Feature
June 9, 2011

Legal experts are warning that a Tennessee bill signed into law earlier this month could subject news organizations to criminal prosecutions if they publish crime scene photographs, biting political cartoons or anything else that might upset people.

The law’s sponsor said the concerns about criminalizing free speech are overblown, as the law is an effort to update the state’s harassment statute to punish perpetrators who target their victims using electronic communications.

Florida sued over law saying doctors can't ask about guns

Emily Peterson | Prior Restraints | Feature | June 7, 2011
Feature
June 7, 2011

Three Florida doctors and three physician trade groups sued the governor and other state officials in federal court on Monday in an effort to overturn, on First Amendment grounds, the state’s new law restricting doctors' discussions about gun ownership with patients.

Amicus brief in Leigh v. Salazar

June 2, 2011

Asking the Ninth Circuit to reverse a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction on behalf of a photographer seeking less restrictive access to federal lands for purposes of photographing the roundup of wild horses.

High court considers First Amendment role in official votes

Kacey Deamer | Prior Restraints | Feature | April 27, 2011
Feature
April 27, 2011

In the final oral argument of the term, the U.S. Supreme Court considered today whether recusal rules interfere with First Amendment rights legislators may have in their legislative votes. Some of the justices' questions in Nevada Commission on Ethics v.

Preacher will challenge ban from mosque protest

Rachel Costello | Prior Restraints | Feature | April 26, 2011
Feature
April 26, 2011

Florida preacher Terry Jones, who recently gained notoriety for burning a Quran, is challenging a Dearborn, Mich., jury verdict and court order that prevented him from staging a protest outside a mosque because he was likely to breach the peace.

Texas judge denies 2nd request for injunction against blog

Lyndsey Wajert | Prior Restraints | Feature | April 21, 2011
Feature
April 21, 2011

A Dallas judge found earlier this week that a plaintiff who tried to silence a blogger through a temporary injunction in a defamation suit did not meet the burden for the injunction.

Lying about military service protected speech, court affirms

Lyndsey Wajert | Prior Restraints | Feature | March 24, 2011
Feature
March 24, 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco (9th Cir.) reaffirmed a sweeping protection of speech earlier this week, denying a petition to rehear a case involving a law that makes lying about receiving military honors a crime.