Covering the war and its aftermath, page 16

Flynt v. Rumsfeld, 2003 WL 355958 (D.D.C. 2003).

Flynt v. Weinberger, 588 F.Supp.57 (1984)

JB Pictures Inc. v. Defense Dep't, 86 F.3d 236 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

Nation Magazine v. Defense Dep't, 762 F.Supp. 1575 (1991)

New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)

Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974)

The Department of Defense's "Principles of Information," DoD Directive 5122.5 (Sept. 27, 2000), can be found at http://www.defenselink.mil/admin/prininfo.html.

The original 1992 nine-point statement of principles signed by Pentagon officials and news media representatives can be found in Appendix IV of the Freedom Forum report America's Team: Media and the Military, located at: http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=13999.

The Pentagon's "Way Ahead in Afghanistan" memorandum is available at: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2001/d20011213media.pdf.

The Pentagon's "Public Affairs Guidance (PAG) on Embedding Media during Possible Future Operations/Deployments in the U.S. Central Commands (CENTCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR)" is available at http://www.dod.gov/news/Feb2003/d20030228pag.pdf.

The Pentagon's "Release, Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement and Agreement Not to Sue" contract with news organizations is available at: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2003/D20030210embed.pdf.

Access to immigration & terrorism proceedings, page 29

Application of Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1 (1946)

Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560 (1981)

Denver Post v. United States, Army Misc. 20041215 (A. C. C. A. Feb. 23, 2005)

Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft, 303 F. 3d 681 (6th Cir. 2002)

Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304 (1946)

Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532 (1965)

Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)

Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)

Ex Parte Vallandigham, 68 U.S. 243 (1863)

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 2005 WL 1653046, No. 04-5393 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 316 F. 3d 450 (4th Cir. 2003)

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 124 S.Ct. 2633 (2004)

Hirota v. MacArthur, 338 U.S. 197 (1948)

In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases, 355 F. Supp. 2d 443 (D. D. C. Jan. 31, 2005)

Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950)

Khalid v. Bush, 355 F. Supp. 2d 311 (D. D. C. Jan. 19, 2005)

M.K.B. v. Warden, 124 S.Ct. 1405, 72 USLW 3538 (cert. denied, Feb. 23, 2004); amicus brief is available at http://www.rcfp.org/news/documents/20031103-mkbvwarden.pdf; motion to intervene is available at http://www.rcfp.org/news/documents/20040102-mkbvwarden.pdf

Madsen v. Kinsella, 343 U.S. 341 (1952)

Media General Operations, Inc. v. Buchanan, 2005 WL 1798341, No. 02-2287 (4th Cir. 2005)

North Jersey Media Grp., Inc. v Ashcroft, 308 F. 3d 198 (3rd Cir. 2002)

O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258 (1969)

Press Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court (Press Enterprise II), 478 U.S. 1 (1986)

Padilla v. Hanft, 2005 WL 465691, No. Civ. A. 2:04-2221-26A (D. S. C. Feb. 28, 2005)

Rasul v. Bush, 124 S.Ct. 2686 (2004)

Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957)

Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980)

Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711 (2004)

U.S. v. Grunden, 2 M.J. 116 (C.M.A. 1977)

U.S. v. McVeigh, 119 F.3d 806 (10th Cir. 1997)

U.S. v. Moussaoui, 205 F.R.D. 183 (E.D. Va. 2002)

U.S. v. Moussaoui, 365 F.3d 292 (4th Cir., 2004)

U.S. ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955)

Westmoreland v. CBS, Inc., 752 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1984)

President Bush's Military Order authorizing military tribunals can be found at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011113-27.html.

The proposed Senate bills to authorize military tribunals — S 1941 and S 1937 — can be found by searching at http://thomas.loc.gov.

The draft list of crimes to be prosecuted by military tribunals can be found at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2003/d20030228dmci.pdf.

The memorandum from Chief Immigration Judge Michael Creppy is available at http://www.aclu.org/court/creppy_memo.pdf

The USA PATRIOT Act and Beyond, page 45

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism ("USA PATRIOT") Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1811, 1821-1829, 1841-1846, 1861-1862.

Privacy Protection Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 2000aa.

In re All Matters Submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 218 F. Supp 2nd 611 (For. Int. Surv. Ct. 2002).

In re Sealed Case No. 02-001, 310 F. 3d 717, (For. Int. Surv. Ct. Rev. 2002)

Some information on the USA PATRIOT Act came from:

Electronic Frontier Foundation, Analysis of the Provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act That Relate to Online Activities, (Oct. 31, 2001) at: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias/20011031_eff_usa_patriot_analysis.html

Electronic Frontier Foundation, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers), Sept. 27, 2001) at: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias /fisa_faq.html

Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Terrorism: Section by Section Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act, (Dec. 10, 2001) at: http://www.cdt.org/security/usapatriot/011210crs.pdf

Also see The USA PATRIOT Act: A Legal Analysis, CRS Report for Congress, (April 15, 2002) at http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31377.pdf

Other useful Web sites: for the text of USA PATRIOT Act, see: http://www.politechbot.com/docs/usa.act.final.102401.html, or: http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html

For more information, see Electronic Frontier Foundation, http://www.eff.org; American Civil Liberties Union, http://www.aclu.org/congress/l110101a.html; and American Library Association, http://www.ala.org/washoff/patriot.html

The letter from Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner and Rep. John Conyers Jr. to Attorney General John Ashcroft can be found at http://www.house.gov/judiciary/ashcroft061302.htm. The Justice Department's response can be found at: http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2002/08/doj072602.pdf

Petition for Leave to Intervene and Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, American Civil Liberties Union, March 3. 2003, available at: http://www.aclu.org/court/court.cfm?ID=11837&c=200&Type=s

Resolution on the USA PATRIOT Act and Related Measures that Influence on the Rights of Library Users, American Library Association Council, Jan. 29, 2003, available at: http://www.ala.org/alaorg/oif/usapatriotresolution.html

FBI Oversight in the 107th Congress by the Senate Judiciary Committee: FISA Implementation Failures, An Interim Report by Senators Patrick Leahy, Charles Grassley, and Arlen Specter, February 2003.

S.B. 436, 108th Cong., 1st Sess. ("Domestic Surveillance Oversight Act of 2003")

Introduction of the Domestic Surveillance Oversight Act of 2003, Senate Bill 436, Congressional Record p. S2703-S2712, Feb. 25, 2003.

S.B. 1695, 108th Cong., 1st Sess. ("PATRIOT Oversight Restoration Act of 2003")

Justice Dept. Drafts Sweeping Expansion of Anti-Terrorism Act, Charles Lewis and Adam Mayle, The Center for Public Integrity, Feb. 7, 2003, available at http://www.publicintegrity.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=502&L1=10&L2=10&L3=0&L4=0&L5=0 (includes draft of "Patriot II").

ASNE memo on the Patriot Act II, Richard M. Schmidt, Jr. and Kevin M. Goldberg, Feb. 25, 2003, available at http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=4348

The reporter's privilege, page 51

Hatfill v. Ashcroft, No. 1:03-cv-01793-RBW (D.D.C. filed Aug. 26, 2003)

In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Miller, 397 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir. 2005), cert. denied sub nom. Miller v. U.S., 125 S.Ct. 2977 (2005).

Prosecutor v. Brdjanin, No. IT-99-36-T (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugo. June 7, 2002)

Prosecutor v. Brdjanin, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal, Case No. IT-99-36-AR73.9 (December 11, 2002)

The New York Times Co. v. Gonzales, No. 04 Civ. 7677(RWS), 2005 WL 427911 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2005)

United States v. Lindh, No. 02-37-A, 2002 WL 1592526 (E.D. Va. July 12, 2002)

United States v. Regan, No. 01-405-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2002) (unpublished order)

United States v. Sattar, No. 1:02-cr-00395-JGK (S.D.N.Y. order Aug. 20, 2004, jury verdict Feb. 10, 2005)

H.R. 581, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. ("Free Flow of Information Act of 2005")

H.R. 3323, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. ("Free Flow of Information Act of 2005")

S. 340, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. ("Free Flow of Information Act of 2005")

S. 369, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. ("Free Speech Protection Act of 2005")

S. 1419, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. ("Free Flow of Information Act of 2005")

S. 3020, 108th Cong., 2nd Sess. ("Free Speech Protection Act of 2004")

The Attorney General's Guidelines for Subpoenaing Members of the News Media are at 28 C.F.R. § 50.10.

Secretary Rumsfeld's press briefing on July 22 regarding news leaks can be found at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2002/07/dod072202.html

Freedom of Information, page 57

ACLU v. County of Hudson, 799 A.2d 629 (N.J. Super. A.D., June 12, 2002)

American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense, No. 04 Civ 4151 (S.D.N.Y., Aug. 16, 2005)

Associated Press v. Department of Defense, No. 05 Civ. 3941 (S.D.N.Y, Aug. 8, 2005)

Brady-Lunny v. Massey, 185 F. Supp. 2d 928 (C.D. Ill., Feb. 8, 2002)

Center for National Security Studies v. U.S. Department of Justice, 217 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2002)

City of Chicago v. Treasury, No. 01-2167 (7th Cir.)(oral arguments heard Feb. 15, 2005)

Department of Justice v. City of Chicago, No. 02-322 (U.S., Feb. 26, 2003), vacating and remanding City of Chicago v. Dept. of Treasury, 297 F.3d 672 (7th Cir. 2002)

Edmonds v. FBI, No. 04-5177 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 9, 2005)

H.R. 867 (109th Congress) (OPEN Government Act)

S.394 (109th Congress) (Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act)

S. 622 (109th Congress) (Restoration of Freedom of Information Act)

Release of Information Regarding Immigration and Naturalization Service Detainees in Non-Federal Facilities, 68 Fed. Reg. 4364 (January 29, 2003) (final rule)

Homeland Security Act, Public Law No: 107-296

FOI policies at Homeland Security: Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Procedures, 68 Fed. Reg. 4055, Jan. 27, 2003.

Consolidated Appropriations Resolution 2003, PL 108-7.

The text of the Ashcroft Oct. 12 memorandum is available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foiapost/200119.htm

The text of the Reno memorandum is available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_XIV3/page2.htm

The Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office offers details and updates about how the government and private industry assure the safety of bridges, roads, computer networks and other infrastructure at http://www.ciao.gov

Three civil libertarian groups — OMB Watch, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the National Coalition Against Censorship — keep a running tally on government efforts to shut down Web sites and restrict expression after September 11.

OMB Watch's page monitoring government sites can be found at: http://www.ombwatch.org/article/archive/104/

EFF's anti-terrorism page can be found at: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias/antiterrorism_chill.html

The National Coalition Against Censorship's site on free expression after September 11 can be found at: http://www.ncac.org/issues/freeex911.html