Letter to U.S. Attorney General protesting subpoena of AP reporter's phone records
The Justice Department received the home phone records of a reporter in an attempt to find his source of information about a federal wiretap.
August 28, 2001
VIA U.S. Mail and E-Mail
Dear Mr. Ashcroft and Mr. Thompson:
We are writing you to protest the subpoena of Associated Press reporter John Solomon's telephone records. We are concerned that this action signals an ominous hostility to the First Amendment rights of reporters at worst, and an indifference to these important rights at best.
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is a voluntary, unincorporated association of reporters and editors that works to defend the First Amendment rights and freedom of information interests of the news media. The Reporters Committee provides representation, guidance and research in First Amendment and Freedom of Information Act litigation. In fact, the Reporters Committee was founded in 1970 on the issue of whether the Nixon Justice Department could subpoena notes and testimony from journalists.
We believe that in a free and democratic society, journalists must be able to protect confidential sources and information. To deny journalists this right threatens the free and independent press guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
For almost 30 years, the Justice Department has recognized that it is a serious step to go after a journalist's notes, records or testimony. Particularly in the case of telephone records, the Department has an obligation under the First Amendment and under its own guidelines to give reporters a chance to contest such an action unless advance notice would jeopardize an investigation. In this case, Mr. Solomon was researching a story about information already in the hands of the government, so it is difficult to understand how any such jeopardy existed.
We understand that Mr. Ashcroft has recused himself from the AP subpoena. However, we believe this incident may be an indication of a dangerous trend and, perhaps, an indication that the Justice Department intends to change long-standing policies against subpoenas of the news media without exhausting all alternative means of acquiring the sought-after information. We ask that the Justice Department give the greatest deference and consideration of the First Amendment and the qualified reporter's privilege when considering these matters.
Sincerely,
Lucy A. Dalglish
| |
Suite 900
rcfp@rcfp.org http://www.rcfp.org
Lucy A. Dalglish
STEERING COMMITTEE • GAIL APPLESONReuters America Inc. • SCOTT APPLEWHITE The Associated Press • ROSEMARY ARMAO Sarasota Herald-Tribune • CHARLES R. BABCOCK The Washington Post • CHIP BOK Akron Beacon Journal • TOM BROKAW NBC News • EARL CALDWELL Syndicated columnist • WALTER CRONKITE CBS News • GARY DECKELNICK Asbury Park Press • CARROLL DOHERTY Pew Research Center • RICHARD S. DUNHAM Business Week • SARA FRITZ St. Petersburg Times • FRED GRAHAM Court TV • JOHN C. HENRY Houston Chronicle • NAT HENTOFF The Village Voice • KAREN GRAY HOUSTON Fox News • ALBERT HUNT The Wall Street Journal • PETER JENNINGS ABC News • STEPHEN LABATON The New York Times • TONY MAURO American Lawyer Media • WILSON F. MINOR Factual Reporting Service • JEFF NESMITH Cox Newspapers • SANDRA PEDDIE Newsday • DAN RATHER CBS News • DAVID ROSENBAUM The New York Times • CRISTINE RUSSELL The Washington Post • CAROLE SIMPSON ABC News
Affiliations appear | |