QUICKLINK   New Jersey · November 10, 2009 · Freedom of information

Police use-of-force reports are public records in New Jersey

Keywords: police records; Public Records

Share:
· Facebook
· LinkedIn
· Email
Print
Link

A New Jersey appeals court on Monday ruled that police use-of-force reports -- generated any time a police offer uses force against a citizen -- are public records and cannot be withheld as criminal investigatory records.

Attorneys for West Milford, a township in northern New Jersey, appealed a state trial court's ruling that the records should be released, arguing that it did not have to hand over the use-of-force reports to local residents and open-records activist Martin O'Shea because the documents were records of ongoing investigations and therefore exempt. Furthermore, the township argued that the use-of-force policy was formulated by the state attorney general and not written into law.

The appeals court disagreed with the township, ruling that the attorney general requires the reports each time force is used. The records are also not created for the purpose of a particular investigation, so whether the reports would ever be used in an investigation is purely speculative, the court held.

The township maintained that releasing the documents would have a chilling effect on how candid officers might be in creating their use-of-force reports. But O’Shea and the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, which filed a friend of the court brief in the case, argued that transparency would promote increased police accountability and allow the public to decide whether law enforcement's use of force was excessive.

"The public has a right to know when police violence is justified and when it's used recklessly," said Bobby Conner, a staff attorney on the ACLU's open governance project, to NewJerseyNewsroom.com. "Replacing secrecy with sunshine allows the public to truly make progress in ensuring the government follows its own laws."

Miranda Fleschert, 3:36 pm


Comments: (1)

Comment by Braveheart, Fri, Nov 13, 2009, 6:15pm

I would like to thank Mr. O'Shea for pursuing this. I am the (famous in NJ GRC documents denying access) Janeczko cited often as a precedent for denying "criminal investigatory records". Eventually, my right to know was acknowledged by the Attorney General's office, but I still don't have Use of Force and/or Internal Investigation. I'm working on it.

The OPRA seems to have been designed to protect the police in NJ!

Good for the ACLU, too. They wouldn't help me, but at least they helped O'Shea.

 


Submit a comment

Name (what you want displayed):

Comment:

Please note: comments with hyperlinks will be rejected.

Email (only if you want to be notified of new comments):



Reporters Committee home

Send comments & tips

Subscribe by email

RSS feed

Follow us on Twitter

Find us on Facebook


News categories:

Broadcasting

Cover Story

Freedom of information

Intellectual property

Internet regulation

Libel

Newsgathering

Prior restraints

Privacy

Reporter's privilege

Secret courts

State open government


News keywords:

[list alphabetically]

Public Records

Shield Law

Subpoenas

Open Records

Confidential source issues

Defamation

E-mail

Sealed records

FOIA

Legislation

Internet

Lawsuits

Sealed cases

Secrecy

FOIA reform

White House

Police

Privacy

Libel

reporters privilege

List all keywords




Search:

Limit by date:

Fr:

To:

Category

Sort by
relevance
date