NEWS MEDIA UPDATE   Wisconsin · November 17, 2009 · State open government

Wisconsin prison hands over grenade video, settles suit

Keywords: Prisoner rights; Public Records

Wisconsin prison officials have released video footage of a guard detonating a grenade typically used for outdoor crowd control in the cell of an individual prisoner after the Associated Press sued to obtain a copy of the footage, the news agency reported.

Share:
· Facebook
· LinkedIn
· Email
Print
Link

The release effectively settles the lawsuit, which the AP filed last month after the Department of Corrections refused to hand over a video that showed a guard throwing a nonlethal stinger grenade into the prisoner's cell. In addition, the department has also agreed to pay $5,000 in attorney fees that the AP would have been entitled to if it had won its case in court, said Robert Dreps, an attorney at Godfrey & Kahn who represented the AP.

The AP requested the video under Wisconsin's freedom of information laws after the department settled a $49,000 lawsuit with the 135-pound inmate, Raynard Jackson, who claimed the use of the grenade constituted excessive force and caused hearing loss.

The department initially denied the request for the video, claiming that release could jeopardize the prison's camera surveillance system and allow inmate viewers to plot against guards. Later, the department admitted the footage was taken by a guard with a hand-held camera, not by the prison’s surveillance system -- a fact AP reporters discovered while covering Jackson's underlying civil rights case, Dreps said.

While the actual video is 20 minutes long, the AP allowed the department to redact the first 15 minutes, which showed the guards preparing for planned use of force with the grenade, a device that releases rubber pellets when it explodes. 

Dreps said the cut portion, which the department played in full during settlement negotiations, was not newsworthy. The AP simply “wanted to show the public what the stinger grenade does and what the aftermath looked like,” he said.

“Redacting sensitive parts is something the department should have considered rather than a straight denial in the first place,” Dreps said.

Miranda Fleschert, 4:02 pm

Copyright 2009 The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.


Comments: (1)

Comment by Lilian LENK, Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 9:40pm

As someone who has worked in the Court system for the past 15 years, I can attest to the fact that brutality,discrimination, entrapment,malice, etc is a day to day occurence by the police force who use their power as a weapon against poor undocumented people. it is a disgrace and a violation of human rights/

 


Submit a comment

Name (what you want displayed):

Comment:

Please note: comments with hyperlinks will be rejected.

Email (only if you want to be notified of new comments):



Reporters Committee home

Send comments & tips

Subscribe by email

RSS feed

Follow us on Twitter

Find us on Facebook


News categories:

Broadcasting

Cover Story

Freedom of information

Intellectual property

Internet regulation

Libel

Newsgathering

Prior restraints

Privacy

Reporter's privilege

Secret courts

State open government


News keywords:

[list alphabetically]

Public Records

Shield Law

Subpoenas

Open Records

Confidential source issues

Defamation

E-mail

Sealed records

FOIA

Legislation

Internet

Lawsuits

Sealed cases

Secrecy

FOIA reform

White House

Police

Privacy

Libel

reporters privilege

List all keywords




Search:

Limit by date:

Fr:

To:

Category

Sort by
relevance
date