QUICKLINK   Michigan · December 8, 2008 · Reporter's privilege

Free Press reporter invokes the Fifth Amendment

Keywords: Confidential source issues; Privacy Act; Testifying against sources

Share:
· Facebook
· LinkedIn
· Email
Print
Link

After failing to persuade a federal judge of his First Amendment right to protect his confidential sources, Detroit Free Press reporter David Ashenfelter tried a new tactic Monday to keep their identities secret: He invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.

Former federal prosecutor Richard Convertino sought to question Ashenfelter during a deposition in Detroit on Monday about the confidential sources the reporter used in a 2004 article on a Department of Justice investigation into Convertino’s misconduct during a terrorism prosecution. Convertino has sued Justice under the Privacy Act for publicizing information about the investigation and is seeking the sources from Ashenfelter to help with his lawsuit.

Since Convertino alleges that Ashenfelter, in refusing to give up his sources, is aiding the crime committed by those who illegally leaked the information in the first place, the reporter decided to invoke his Fifth Amendment right against making self-incriminating statements, the Free Press reported on Monday.

“The First Amendment ought to be enough to protect journalists,” the newspaper said in a statement. “They should not have to fear prosecution for serving the public’s right to know. They should not have to disclose confidential sources who risk retaliation to come forward with important information.”

The newspaper has refused to give up any sources and has challenged Convertino’s subpoena on First Amendment and common law grounds, but U.S. District Judge Robert Cleland, in Detroit, has repeatedly ruled against the newspaper.

The newspaper maintains that it still believes Ashenfelter has a First Amendment right to protect his sources, the Free Press reported.

Steven M. Kohn, Convertino’s attorney, told the Free Press after the deposition that he didn’t believe Ashenfelter had any basis to invoke the Fifth Amendment. He said he might ask the judge to hold Ashenfelter in contempt.

This isn’t the first time a reporter has invoked the Fifth Amendment as a way to protect sources. Washington Times reporter William Gertz successfully invoked it this summer when he was ordered to testify about confidential sources he used to report about a Chinese spy ring in California.  

Samantha Fredrickson, 5:16 pm · Comments: 0


Submit a comment

Name (what you want displayed):

Comment:

Please note: comments with hyperlinks will be rejected.



Reporters Committee home

Send comments & tips

Subscribe by email

RSS feed

Follow us on Twitter

Find us on Facebook


News categories:

Broadcasting

Freedom of information

Intellectual property

Internet regulation

Libel

Newsgathering

Prior restraints

Privacy

Reporter's privilege

Secret courts

State open government


News keywords:

[list alphabetically]

Public Records

Shield Law

Open Records

Defamation

Subpoenas

Confidential source issues

FOIA

E-mail

Sealed records

Legislation

Secrecy

Internet

Lawsuits

Sealed cases

Police

White House

FOIA reform

Libel

Privacy

Public officials

List all keywords




Search:

Limit by date:

Fr:

To:

Category

Sort by
relevance
date