Photographers' Guide to Privacy

Arizona

Arizona has recognized the four privacy torts.

Intrusion: An undercover television news crew gained access to a medical laboratory by posing as potential business associates and secretly videotaped their meetings with a doctor. The doctors intrusion claim failed because he could not have had a reasonable expectation of privacy in an office open to the public, nor could he reasonably expect to keep private a conversation with strangers about the medical testing industry. In addition, the television crew did not act in a manner that would have been highly offensive to a reasonable person because they did not put anyone in danger, did not invade the doctors home, and were pursuing a story about a matter of public health. Medical Laboratory Management Consultants v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., 30 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (D. Ariz. 1998).

False light: A newspaper article linking a man to the deaths of two young boys did not place him in a false light when it accurately named him as a murder suspect. The fact that others might conclude -- perhaps inaccurately -- from reading the article that the man actually killed the children does not alter the truth of the statement that he was a suspect in a homicide investigation. Meador v. New Times, Inc., 36 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1994).


(C) 1999 The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be reproduced without the written permission of the Reporters Committee. Printed copies of this guide are available through our online order form.