Skip to content

Requesters challenge Virginia open records law

Post categories

  1. Freedom of information
Two plaintiffs are challenging Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act in federal court there because it requires requesters to be citizens…

Two plaintiffs are challenging Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act in federal court there because it requires requesters to be citizens of the state.

The plaintiffs, residents of California and Rhode Island, represented by Georgetown’s Institute for Public Representation, filed suit against Virginia claiming the law’s citizen-requirement violates their constitutional rights.

Mark McBurney, of Rhode Island, is seeking records related to his own efforts to recover child support he is owed. Roger Hurlbert, of California, is seeking property assessment records related to his business.

Both argue Virginia’s requirement that FOIA requesters be Virginia citizens violates the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution. That provision requires states to treat citizens of other states with the same rights under law as their own citizens.

As a result, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit argue, Virginia’s provision is unconstitutional.

Delaware’s open records law had a similar provision, which the U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia (3rd Cir.) overturned in 2006.

Stay informed by signing up for our monthly newsletter

Keep up with the Reporters Committee by subscribing to our monthly newsletter! We'll send you updates about our work defending the rights of journalists, the latest news on press freedom, original analyses on First Amendment issues, and more.