Skip to content

Center for Investigative Reporting v. United States Department of Labor

Post categories

  1. Freedom of Information

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed an amicus brief in Center for Investigative Reporting v. United States Department of Labor, a case before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case presents one of the first instances a district court may rule on an agency’s burden to satisfy Exemption 4 and foreseeable harm since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media. The brief argues that the legislative history of the foreseeable harm standard makes clear that Congress intended to create a new, distinct requirement that agencies must satisfy when making FOIA withholdings. It also argues that the standard requires, in the Exemption 4 context, for agencies to show that disclosure would lead to competitive harm to a third party, similar to the D.C. Circuit’s test in National Parks Conservation Association v. Morton.

2019-09-30 CIR v. DOL Amicus Brief