Case Number: 21-80017
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Clients: Forbes Media LLC, Thomas Brewster
Application to Unseal Filed: Jan. 25, 2021
Background: The federal government has long used the All Writs Act to compel private companies to assist law enforcement investigations, though rarely without controversy. In one high-profile example, the government cited the 232-year-old law in its attempt to force Apple to unlock an iPhone owned by the shooter in the 2015 San Bernardino terrorist attack. While that request was litigated in open court, many such applications for “technical assistance” are filed and granted in secret.
Recently, as Forbes Associate Editor Thomas Brewster first reported, the All Writs Act has been used to track suspects by harnessing mammoth, billion-dollar private travel databases in real-time. These databases have records on everything from airline flights to hotel reservations. But their use has concerned legal experts, who say that the government’s application of the law could set a dangerous precedent.
Recent orders and applications to harness these databases have remained under seal in three federal district courts. On behalf of Forbes and its Associate Editor Thomas Brewster, Reporters Committee attorneys have requested that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California unseal one such order from 2016, arguing that the press and public have a constitutional and common-law right to access the order and the government’s application for it. (Reporters Committee attorneys have also filed applications to unseal similar orders in federal courts in Pennsylvania and Washington.)
Quote: “Unsealing the AWA Materials at issue will ensure that actions of both the executive and judicial branches are open to public scrutiny, and will help inform the active, ongoing public debate over the government’s use of the All Writs Act to compel private technology companies to provide technical assistance.
2021-01-25: Application to unseal court records
2021-04-26: Report and recommendation to deny petition