Skip to content

State of Oklahoma v. Pridgeon

Post categories

  1. Freedom of Information

Case Number: CF-2021-98

Court: District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma

Client: Muskogee Phoenix

Motion Filed: Feb. 18, 2021

Background: Muskogee County District Attorney Orvil Loge moved to block the release of body camera footage and a 911 call recording related to a high-profile murder case, arguing the public records would compromise an ongoing investigation.

On behalf of the Muskogee Phoenix, Reporters Committee Local Legal Initiative Attorney KatieBeth Gardner intervened in the matter and requested the court presiding over the criminal prosecution reject the district attorney’s motion to shield the records from the public. She argued that prosecutors failed to meet the required showing under the Oklahoma Open Records Act to withhold the video evidence and were without a proper basis in law to ask the court to withhold the 911 calls.

Quote: “This tragic series of events has deeply affected the community and sent shockwaves far beyond. Spurred to action, the community has come together to organize fundraising efforts, vigils, and memorials. The public has a right to information, such as the body camera footage, that would better inform their understanding of what took place.”

Update: The Muskogee Phoenix obtained the 911 recording after the court ordered its release on March 2, finding in favor of the public interest and no compelling reason to withhold the tape from the public. The court is expected to resolve the body camera footage issue after a hearing in June.


2021-02-18: Special entry of appearance on behalf of the Muskogee Phoenix to respond to the state’s motion to prevent release of video evidence and 911 calls

2021-02-24: Court order

2021-03-02: Court order