Skip to content

Photojournalist ordered to enable fishing expedition.

Post categories

  1. Protecting sources and materials
Another case of a journalist being held in contempt of court for refusing to let his newsgathering product be used…

Another case of a journalist being held in contempt of court for refusing to let his newsgathering product be used in a criminal trial has come to a head in California.

Santa Barbara Independent photographer Paul Wellman had taken more than 300 pictures at a murder scene back in March, and Superior Court Judge Brian Hill has ordered that he turn those over to defense counsel — despite a strong California shield law that should let such a subpoena be quashed.

The judge noted; “Those photographs might have material significance. Some of the photos may impeach the manner in which the case proceeded." Emphasis ours, of course; the judge wouldn’t want to look like he’s saying that a purely speculative interest in seeing more photos of a crime scene outweighs a journalist’s First Amendment-based interest in being independent of the judicial process, a right long recognized in California. Instead, he wants it to appear that there’s a substantive fair-trial issue at stake here.

Let’s be clear here — there’s not; the defense counsel is on a classic fishing expedition, hoping something would come up in the photos that she doesn’t know about yet. Hopefully Wellman won’t have to go to jail to make that point.

Stay informed by signing up for our monthly newsletter

Keep up with the Reporters Committee by subscribing to our monthly newsletter! We'll send you updates about our work defending the rights of journalists, the latest news on press freedom, original analyses on First Amendment issues, and more.