Skip to content
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press homepage
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Open mobile menu
Legal Hotline
Search
Submit
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Search
Submit
Our social media accounts
twitter
linkedin
facebook
Capital Punishment
Posts
Redacted briefs before Supreme Court violate First Amendment
Public should have access to expert testimony on controversial lethal injection drug, NPR and Reporters Committee argue.
June 7, 2019
By
Courtney Douglas
and
Sarah Matthews
Categorized in
Court Access
view more
