Skip to content
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press homepage
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Open mobile menu
Legal Hotline
Search
Submit
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Search
Submit
Our social media accounts
twitter
linkedin
facebook
United States v. Rosenow
Posts
Federal appeals court decides constitutionality of content preservation in one paragraph
The ruling could potentially authorize the government to force a third party communications provider to copy a reporter’s personal information.
May 23, 2022
By
Gillian Vernick
Categorized in
Protecting Sources and Materials
view more
