Skip to content

UPDATE: U.S. SUPREME COURT

Post categories

  1. Libel and privacy
UPDATE: U.S. SUPREME COURT 05/18/98 In late April the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to review the decision of the…

UPDATE: U.S. SUPREME COURT

05/18/98

In late April the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to review the decision of the Arkansas Supreme Court that a former U.S. attorney was not a public figure for the purpose of a libel suit the attorney won against a Little Rock newspaper.

Former U.S. Attorney J. Michael Fitzhugh sued the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for libel after the newspaper accidentally printed his picture next to a story about Eugene Fitzhugh, an attorney accused of Whitewater-related crimes. The trial court held that J. Michael Fitzhugh was a private individual who had only to prove that the Democrat-Gazette had been negligent when it defamed him. The newspaper had argued that, because in the past Fitzhugh had been a well-known public official whose work had been covered by the media, he was a public figure and thus would have to prove that the newspaper knowingly printed a falsehood or showed reckless disregard for the truth.

The jury awarded $50,000 to Fitzhugh, and the state Supreme Court affirmed the holding of the trial court. (Little Rock Newspapers Inc. v. Fitzhugh; Media Counsel: John Tull, Little Rock)

Stay informed by signing up for our monthly newsletter

Keep up with the Reporters Committee by subscribing to our monthly newsletter! We'll send you updates about our work defending the rights of journalists, the latest news on press freedom, original analyses on First Amendment issues, and more.