Skip to content

Actual malice required in cases of public interest

Post categories

  1. Libel and Privacy
Actual malice required in cases of public interest04/04/95 ALASKA--In mid-March the Alaska Supreme Court in Anchorage dismissed a libel action…


ALASKA–In mid-March the Alaska Supreme Court in Anchorage dismissed a libel action brought against the Juneau Empire by a tramway developer after finding that the developer was a public figure and did not demonstrate actual malice. The court also held that actual malice must be proven in cases involving matters of public interest, regardless of the plaintiff’s status.

The high court affirmed a trial court’s holding that the developer, Charles Keen, was a public figure. The court noted that Keen, as president of Alaska Trams, voluntarily sought public approval for the tramway project. The court also stated that the tramway project was a matter of public concern.

The Supreme Court stated that even if Keen were not a public figure, the actual malice standard would apply to one of the allegedly libelous articles, because it concerned a matter of public interest. The article alleged that hazardous material was stored in an area owned by Keen’s company for the tramway project.

In June 1991 Keen had sued the newspaper for libel in Superior Court in Ketchikan, alleging that the newspaper printed false articles with malicious intent to impede the tramway project. The trial court granted summary judgment to the newspaper, finding that Keen was a public figure and did not demonstrate that the newspaper acted with actual malice — knowledge that the article was false or a reckless disregard for the truth.

The court explained that although the articles contained some inaccuracies, the newspaper did not have any reason to doubt the truth of what was printed.

The court also approved the trial court’s award of more than $31,000 in attorney’s fees to the newspaper. (Mount Juneau Enterprises v. Juneau Empire; Media Counsel: L. Merrill Lowden, Juneau)

The Reporters Committee regularly files friend-of-the-court briefs and its attorneys represent journalists and news organizations pro bono in court cases that involve First Amendment freedoms, the newsgathering rights of journalists and access to public information. Stay up-to-date on our work by signing up for our monthly newsletter and following us on Twitter or Instagram.