Skip to content

Caplan v. WP Company LLC v. District of Columbia

Post categories

  1. Court Access
The Washington Post sought access to a sealed summary judgment motion and a sealed opinion granting summary judgment in a…

The Washington Post sought access to a sealed summary judgment motion and a sealed opinion granting summary judgment in a civil case in the District of Columbia Superior Court. The civil case was filed by a couple whose children were removed from their home on suspicion of child abuse. A family court later found no reason to suspect abuse, and the children were returned to the home. The Caplans later sued the Family Services Agency for negligent and malicious conduct, and the court denied public access to the case. The Post appealed to the D.C. Court of Appeals.

The Reporters Committee with 19 other media groups argued that the Superior Court’s denial of the Post’s motion violated both the common law and First Amendment rights of access. The brief emphasized the wide consensus that the First Amendment right of access applies to civil filings generally, and dispositive motions and judicial opinions specifically, urging the D.C. Court of Appeals to apply a First Amendment standard.

Caplan v. WP Company LLC v. District of Columbia

Stay informed by signing up for our mailing list

Keep up with our work by signing up to receive our monthly newsletter. We'll send you updates about the cases we're doing with journalists, news organizations, and documentary filmmakers working to keep you informed.