Skip to content

PETA v. Cooper

Post categories

  1. Newsgathering

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed an amicus brief in People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, et al. v. Cooper, et al., currently pending before the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, several animal protection groups, are challenging the constitutionality of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99A-2, which creates a cause of action against employees for recording “images or sound occurring within an employer’s premises” and who use the recording “to breach the person’s duty of loyalty to the employer.” The provision also makes “[a]ny person who intentionally directs, assists, compensates, or induces another person to violate this section . . . jointly liable.” Plaintiffs argue the North Carolina law violates the 1st and 14th Amendments, and contend that the law is preventing legitimate investigations into unethical, illegal, or unsanitary practices on a wide swath of businesses and properties.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99A-2 applies to all properties in North Carolina, including but not limited to agricultural facilities — the traditional target of “ag-gag” laws. The Reporters Committee’s amicus brief focuses on the impact that the law has on members of the news media, including by chilling reporter-source communications and stifling investigative journalism on any number of topics.

2019-09-03-PETA-v-Cooper