First Amendment

The ruling “is a huge win for press freedom” — and for the RCFP-led media coalition that challenged the law.

The Supreme Court has before it petitions that raise important questions for members of the news media.

RCFP had urged the court to rule in X Corp. v. Bonta that core provisions of the law were unconstitutional.

The court agreed with RCFP’s argument that the law imposes unconstitutional content-based restrictions on news publishers.

"On the whole, principles that protect a free press made it out of the term unscathed or fortified."

In its decision, the Court reaffirmed a key principle at the core of the Constitution's protections for a free press.

In NRA v. Vullo, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed its seminal ruling in a 1963 case, Bantam Books v. Sullivan.

A bill pending in the Senate would strip tax-exempt status from nonprofits that the Treasury secretary labels “terrorist supporting organizations.”

Attorneys from RCFP and Yale's MFIA Clinic helped journalist Brittany Hailer reach a settlement with the county.

A longstanding First Amendment protection for a free press may no longer have five votes at the Supreme Court.