Skip to content

Jailed reporter will ask U.S. Supreme Court to release her

Post categories

  1. Protecting Sources and Materials

    NMU         TEXAS         Confidentiality/Privilege         Nov 16, 2001    

Jailed reporter will ask U.S. Supreme Court to release her

  • Author Vanessa Leggett tried unsuccessfully this week to persuade a lower court to release her from jail while she fights a contempt charge for refusing to divulge confidential research to a grand jury.

Author Vanessa Leggett, who has spent 119 days in jail for refusing to divulge her book research to a grand jury, will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to free her.

Her attorney, Mike DeGeurin, said he and Leggett decided to appeal to the high court after the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans (5th Cir.) refused this week to reconsider her case and declined to release her on bond pending exhaustion of her appeals.

Federal prosecutors want to see more than four years’ worth of research Leggett had gathered for a book she planned to write about a high-profile Houston murder. A federal district judge held her in contempt in July for refusing to turn over the research.

Leggett has been incarcerated since July 20 in the Federal Detention Center in Houston.

Subpoenaing Leggett’s research was the easiest way for prosecutors to investigate the murder, DeGeurin said.

“From July until now they’ve had time to talk to everybody she talked to and to do their own independent investigation, and they probably don’t have a need for the information,” DeGeurin said.

Leggett, a free-lance writer, has claimed a reporter’s privilege to prevent the disclosure of the confidential research. But a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit ruled in August that regardless of whether Leggett is considered a journalist, there is no reporter’s privilege that would allow her to refuse to testify and withhold research from a grand jury. The full appellate court let that ruling stand on Nov. 13.

DeGeurin said he will argue to the Supreme Court that the federal district judge should have balanced the federal prosecutors’ need for the information against the public’s interest in a free press.

(In re Grand Jury Subpoenas; Author’s counsel: Mike DeGeurin, Foreman, DeGeurin, Nugent & Gerger, Houston) MD

Related stories:


© 2001 The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Return to: RCFP Home; News Page