Skip to content
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press homepage
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Open mobile menu
Legal Hotline
Search
Submit
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Search
Submit
Our social media accounts
twitter
linkedin
facebook
Anti-SLAPP laws
Posts
Ninth Circuit rules in favor of tech review website in defamation suit
IPVM, represented by attorneys from RCFP and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, was sued over critical reviews about a fever-detection device.
November 16, 2022
By
Reporters Committee
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Kurland v. Glassdoor
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division — First Department Date Filed: April 1, 2022 Update: On May 19, 2022,…
April 19, 2022
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Reporters Committee Q&A unpacks anti-SLAPP law
"The absence of anti-SLAPP laws would be really damaging to an independent press."
December 3, 2021
By
Kacie Yamamoto
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
CoreCivic v. Candide Group
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Date Filed: Oct. 26, 2021 Update: On Aug. 30, 2022, the…
November 18, 2021
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
VIP Pet Grooming Studio, Inc. v. Sproule
Court: Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division — Second Department Date Filed: Oct. 25, 2021 Background:…
November 8, 2021
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
‘Actual malice’ and internet speech
The rise of “internet speech” is at the heart of a libel case SCOTUS is considering whether to hear.
November 1, 2021
By
Gillian Vernick
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Thurlow v. Nelson
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court Date Filed: June 22, 2021 Update: In an opinion issued on Nov. 23, 2021, the…
June 24, 2021
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Boyd v. Law
Court: Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division of Nashville Date Filed: March 18, 2021 Background: After an unpleasant exchange…
March 19, 2021
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Reporters Committee applauds changes to New York anti-SLAPP law
The legislation improves protections for reporters and others facing frivolous lawsuits intended to intimidate and silence them.
November 10, 2020
By
Reporters Committee
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Reporters Committee urges New York governor to strengthen anti-SLAPP law
Update (Nov. 10, 2020): On Nov. 10, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed A. 5991-A into law, expanding protections for…
November 6, 2020
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Libel and Privacy
view more
Posts navigation
Older posts