Skip to content
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press homepage
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
Freedom of the Press Awards
Legal Resources
Trainings
All Guides and Resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Open Courts Compendium
Reporter’s Privilege Compendium
A Reporter’s Guide to Pre-Publication Review
Anti-SLAPP Legal Guide
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Get Involved
Donate
Ways to Give
Work With Us
Open mobile menu
Legal Hotline
Search
Submit
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
Freedom of the Press Awards
Legal Resources
Trainings
All Guides and Resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Open Courts Compendium
Reporter’s Privilege Compendium
A Reporter’s Guide to Pre-Publication Review
Anti-SLAPP Legal Guide
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Get Involved
Donate
Ways to Give
Work With Us
Search
Submit
Our social media accounts
twitter
linkedin
facebook
New York Post
Posts
Special analysis: Why did the NYPD cite an ‘anti-terrorism’ law when it subpoenaed a reporter’s Twitter account?
The NYPD ultimately withdrew its demand, but the department’s initial overreach raises serious concerns for journalists.
February 21, 2020
By
Gabe Rottman
Categorized in
Protecting Sources and Materials
view more
