U.S. Supreme Court

RCFP explains what actual malice really means, how the legal standard benefits journalists and the public, and more.

The First Amendment cases still sitting on the Supreme Court's docket could significantly reshape the law.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Twitter v. Taamneh is important for journalists, writes RCFP's Gabe Rottman.

Case Number: 2015PR30176 Court: Combined Court, Boulder County, Colorado Client: Shelly Bradbury Motion Filed: May 11, 2023 Background: In April…

Reporter Tom Jones explains what he’s learned from records NBC 7 San Diego and RCFP obtained through FOIA litigation.

Last week, the Walt Disney Company sued Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, alleging that the governor and his allies had illegally retaliated against…

We break down oral arguments in Counterman v. Colorado, a "true threats" case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The proposals are receiving strong pushback from conservative politicians and media outlets.

Does the federal bar on encouraging unlawful immigration violate the First Amendment?

At the end of the day, the populist argument for revisiting Sullivan is simply unintuitive.