Google

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Twitter v. Taamneh is important for journalists, writes RCFP's Gabe Rottman.

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh.

The Supreme Court asked the solicitor general to weigh in on whether it should hear the social media cases.

A case before the U.S. Supreme Court could transform the internet and have major implications for journalists.

The Oregonian, represented by an RCFP attorney, reached an agreement with The Dalles to disclose how much water Google uses.

The debate follows Australia’s adoption of a law requiring tech companies to negotiate with news organizations over access to their content.

There's growing interest in the nation's capital in revising Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Here’s what the staff of the Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press…

Google and other search engines can’t be required to take down links worldwide that have been delisted in the EU.

By Bruce D. Brown and Alan B. Davidson