Skip to content
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press homepage
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Open mobile menu
Legal Hotline
Search
Submit
Our Work
What We Do
Litigation
Amicus Briefs and Comments
Local Legal Initiative
ProJourn
Freedom of the Press Awards
Calendar of Events
Legal Resources
All Guides and Resources
Election 2024: Journalist resources
Election Legal Guide
Reporters’ Recording Guide
Open Government Guide
Trainings
Free Press Topics
All Topics
Content Restrictions
Court Access
Freedom of Information
Libel and Privacy
Newsgathering
Prior Restraint
Reporter’s Privilege
Who We Are
Staff
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Work With Us
Annual Report
Our History
Logo and Brand Guidelines
Donate
Donate to the Reporters Committee
Become a sustaining donor
Ways to support the Reporters Committee
Search
Submit
Our social media accounts
twitter
linkedin
facebook
Google
Posts
The Twitter decision is about more than the internet
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Twitter v. Taamneh is important for journalists, writes RCFP's Gabe Rottman.
May 30, 2023
By
Gabe Rottman
Categorized in
Content Restrictions
view more
Brazil’s high court should uphold country’s intermediary liability shield
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is urging the Brazilian Supreme Court to uphold a law that is…
March 29, 2023
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Content Restrictions
view more
Supreme Court seems hesitant to transform online discourse
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh.
February 27, 2023
By
Emily Hockett
Categorized in
Content Restrictions
view more
Supreme Court pushes Texas, Florida social media cases down the road
The Supreme Court asked the solicitor general to weigh in on whether it should hear the social media cases.
January 30, 2023
By
Grayson Clary
Categorized in
First Amendment
view more
Will the Supreme Court break the internet?
A case before the U.S. Supreme Court could transform the internet and have major implications for journalists.
January 23, 2023
By
Emily Hockett
Categorized in
Content Restrictions
view more
Gonzalez v. Google
Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date Filed: Jan. 19, 2023 Update: On May 18, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court sent the…
January 20, 2023
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Content Restrictions
view more
Google uses a lot of water in Oregon’s city of The Dalles. Soon we’ll know how much.
The Oregonian, represented by an RCFP attorney, reached an agreement with The Dalles to disclose how much water Google uses.
December 15, 2022
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Freedom of Information
view more
Media coalition urges SDNY to require public filing of complaint against Google
Update: On Oct. 15, 2021, a federal judge partially denied and partially granted Google's motion to seal portions of the…
September 23, 2021
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Court Access
view more
Twitter v. Paxton
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Date Filed: March 24, 2021 Update: On May 11, 2021,…
March 25, 2021
By
Chris Young
Categorized in
Content Restrictions
view more
Controversy over US platform bargaining proposal heats up
The debate follows Australia’s adoption of a law requiring tech companies to negotiate with news organizations over access to their content.
March 22, 2021
By
Grayson Clary
Categorized in
Policy
view more
Posts navigation
Older posts