This spring, the United States Supreme Court will interpret for the first time the exemption that allows for trade secrets to be withheld from disclosure under the federal Freedom of Information Act.
In a nearly decade-long legal dispute over whether data on the annual revenue that retailers receive from the federal nutrition assistance program should be made public, Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media is giving the nation’s highest court its first opportunity to interpret FOIA’s Exemption 4.
The exemption allows an agency to withhold “trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.” The Supreme Court will decide whether the government can withhold from the public information that businesses have submitted to it, but that those businesses argue is confidential, or whether the information should be withheld only if substantial competitive harm would result from the disclosure. Courts have interpreted this exemption differently.
In the Argus Leader’s legal battle for access to nutrition assistance program data, both the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food Marketing Institute have said that sharing the data would cause competitive harm to retailers. The courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, have repeatedly rejected that notion.
The legal fight moved to the halls of Congress last year when the Food Marketing Institute pushed Congress to include a specific exemption from disclosure for this information as part of the farm bill. After the Reporters Committee and other groups objected, the provision was dropped from the final language before President Trump signed the bill.
The Reporters Committee plans to file an amicus brief on behalf of a media coalition in support of the Argus Leader. Oral arguments in FMI v. Argus Leader have been scheduled for April 22.