3. Commission or agency enforcement
Posts
-
view more
California
Local ordinances governing access to public meetings and public records (commonly referred to as sunshine ordinances) often provide for administrative review of agency decisions, though determinations are generally recommendatory and unenforceable. Aggrieved individuals should ascertain whether their municipality has a sunshine ordinance and, if so, what procedures are provided for review of agency denials. Some state agencies may also have similar procedures for review of agency denials.
-
view more
Connecticut
FOIA is enforced by the Freedom of Information Commission (FOIC), which consists of five members appointed by the governor with the approval of the legislature and four members appointed by other officials. See Conn. Gen. Stat. §1-205. The FOIC is charged with promptly reviewing any alleged violation of FOIA and issuing orders regarding such allegations. The commission has the power to investigate allegations, including the power to hold hearings, administer oaths, examine witnesses, receive oral and documentary evidence, subpoena witnesses, and require the production of books and papers it deems relevant to the investigation. Conn. Gen. Stat. §1-205.
-
view more
District of Columbia
The D.C. Act contemplates appeals of adverse decisions by individual petitioners, not commission or agency enforcement. D.C. Code Ann. § 2-537(a).
-
view more
Florida
In 2007, the Governor created the Office of Open Government, intended to ensure compliance with the state’s open government and public records laws. Fla. Exec. Order No. 07-01 (2007). The Order directed each agency to designate a person to act as the agency’s “public records/open government contact person,” who would be responsible for complying with open government and public records requests. See id.
-
view more
Georgia
The Open Government Mediation Program is a service of the Attorney General's office designed to assist members of the public whose local governments may not be complying with requirements of the Act
-
view more
Indiana
The Act neither requires nor provides for enforcement procedures by a commission or agency. A person denied access should seek the intervention of the state Public Access Counselor, not only to facilitate access but also to lay the foundation for entitlement to attorney fees if litigation is required. Ind. Code § 5-14-3-9(i).
-
view more
Maryland
Maryland has established a State Public Information Act Compliance Board for the purpose of resolving unreasonable fee complaints; studying ongoing compliance by custodians; and making recommendations for improvement to the General Assembly. § 4-1A-04(a), (b). Annually, the Board submits a report to the Governor describing its activities and opinions, complaints filed, and recommendations for improvement. § 4-1A-04(c). The Board consists of 5 members, one of whom is from a Maryland non-governmental, non-profit organization that works on issues related to transparency or open government and is nominated by representatives of the open government and news media communities. § 4-1A-02(a)(2)(i). Another member of the Board must be knowledgeable about the Public Information Act, have served as a custodian, and been nominated by the Maryland Association of Counties and the Maryland Municipal League. § 4-1A-02(a)(2)(ii). The other 3 members are private citizens who cannot be a custodian of a public record, a member of the news media, or a staff member or spokesperson for an organization that represents the interests of either custodians or applicants. § 4-1A-02(a)(2)(iii). At least one of the 5 members must be an attorney admitted in the State. § 4-1A-02(a)(3). The term for members of the Board is generally 3 years. § 4-1A-02(c).
-
view more
Massachusetts
Division of Public Records and Supervisor of Public Records.
-
view more
Minnesota
A party aggrieved by a decision not to allow access to data may ask the Commissioner of Administration to issue an opinion with respect to the nature of the data sought. Minn. Stat.§ 13.072, subd. 1(a). The opinions are not binding on a public agency, but must be given deference by a court in a proceeding regarding the data. Minn. Stat.§ 13.072, subd. 2. An aggrieved party may also seek a hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings. Minn. Stat. § 13.085.
-
view more
Mississippi
The Mississippi Ethics Commission (http://www.ethics.state.ms.us/ethics/ethics.nsf) has enforcement power over the act.
-
view more
New Hampshire
There is no commission or agency to enforce the law.
-
view more
New Jersey
A person who is denied access to a government record may file a complaint with the Government Records Council established pursuant to OPRA. (See N.J.S.A. 47:1A-6).
-
view more
New Mexico
No authority.
-
view more
North Carolina
None.
-
view more
North Dakota
The open records statute does not address commission or agency enforcement.
-
view more
Pennsylvania
None.
-
view more
Rhode Island
No specific provision.
-
view more
South Carolina
None.
-
view more
South Dakota
Yes. As of 2008 there has been a hearing examiner procedure, but no cases have been presented yet that involve the open records law that went into effect on July 1, 2009. SDCL §1-27-38.
-
view more
Texas
Section 552.009 establishes an open records steering committee that shall study and determine the types of public info that should be made available by the Internet or other electronic means. State governmental bodies shall report to the attorney general information regarding the number and nature of requests for information they process, the cost of processing such requests and the cost of making information available to the public by means of the Internet or another electronic format. Tex. Gov’t Code § 552.010.
A requestor who believes he or she has been overcharged may lodge a complaint with the Office of the Attorney General. Tex. Gov’t Code § 552.269.
-
view more
Utah
The Government Records Office “shall be a resource to citizens and government entities in relation to government records, including: (a) ensuring lawful access to records; (b) ensuring the lawful restriction of access to records; (c) classification of records; (d) retention of records; and (e) resolving records disputes informally, via informal mediation, or via the records appeal process.” Utah Code § 63A-12-203(3).
The director of the office is appointed by the governor: “(a) in consultation with the executive director; and (b) with the advice and consent of the Senate.” Utah Code § 63A-12-202(2). The director shall be an attorney in good standing and knowledgeable regarding state law and practices relating to records management. Utah Code § 63A-12-202(3). The director’s duties include supervising and managing the office; appointing and supervising a government records ombudsman; administering the records appeal process; hearing appeals regarding disputed fees; hearing and deciding appeals from determinations of access; and determining disputes submitted by the state auditor. Utah Code § 63A-12-203(1).
-
view more
Washington
There is no commission or agency that enforces the Public Records Act. The state Public Disclosure Commission only enforces the campaign finance disclosure aspects of the Public Disclosure Act. RCW 42.17.350, .360, .390.
-
view more
West Virginia
Neither the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act nor the West Virginia Open Governmental Proceedings Act provides for commission or agency enforcement.